Current Classifieds

1973 Pinto 2.3 4 speed transmission. Tube frame roadster frame (roller). 1971 Pinto 2.0 radiator.
Date: 09/05/2018 06:30 pm
Rally spoiler wanted
Date: 05/04/2017 01:32 pm
Need Brakes for 1971 Pinto
Date: 04/27/2018 11:48 pm
I have a 1977 Cobra body lots of parts here
Date: 04/12/2017 06:57 pm
72 Pinto racecar, 2.3 ARCA engine, Quaife trans
Date: 01/10/2022 03:41 pm
1971 2 lt Cam
Date: 10/10/2020 06:27 pm
78 pinto wagon

Date: 06/04/2020 12:42 pm
1978 PINTO PONY FOR SALE 17,000 ORIGINAL MILES !!!!!!!
Date: 10/10/2019 10:02 pm
Pinto drive train

Date: 06/29/2018 08:32 am
WANTED: Skinny Rear Bumper w/o guards for '71 or '72 Pinto Coupe
Date: 04/24/2018 11:45 am
door sills
Date: 03/14/2020 03:20 pm
72 pinto

Date: 06/23/2016 12:40 pm

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: surprising U-tube  (Read 1440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JoeBob

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 536
  • FeedBack: +51/-0
  • Gender: Male

    • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Photographer Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
surprising U-tube
« on: June 25, 2023, 02:17:23 AM »
     So I was goofing on u-tube and came across this video. "Ford disaster the Pinto" I just assumed this was going to be another false hit piece. I was wrong. It repeated the wrong information we have all heard. Then in the end it clarifies everything. It was quite fair. I only wish it told everyone it was false from the beginning. I don't think most peoples attention span will let the stay until the end.     So I looked it up again to make sure I had the title correct so that you all can find it. This time I got a whole bunch of stories all in favor of our car.
     It appears that the truth has finally been accepted in most circles. I still have people at car shows that tell me I live in a fantasy world.
Bill
   
 
Logged
77 yellow Bobcat hatchback
Deuteronomy 7:9

Offline Wittsend

  • Pinto Sr. Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2500
  • FeedBack: +241/-0

    • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Mobile User Topic Starter Poll Voter 1000 Posts Linux User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: surprising U-tube
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2023, 11:09:24 AM »
I assume you are referring to this video -
  .


I laugh when people make a point that the gas tank was in the rear of the car. That's where it is in about 98% of every car. The simple truth is if you make a car light to improve mileage and keep the cost down (so people can afford it) you HAVE to compromise somewhere. There are scores of cars that were manufactured with these same "flaws." The fact that Ford did do something, that being lengthening the filler neck and a dubious plastic shield to protect the gas tank from rearend bolts (6-3/4" rear end, not the 8") does indicate a degree of liability, but sometimes these aren't known until real world experience rears its ugly head. The supposed value place on a human life (cheaper to pay out verdicts than fix the problem) might have been a lesser matter than (to Ford) if they fixed a problem they are admitting that there was one over ignoring it.



Logged

Offline rob289c

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
  • FeedBack: +7/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary Signature Topic Starter
Re: surprising U-tube
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2023, 08:30:52 PM »
A friend of mine had a 73 sedan when we were teens.  In a high speed loss of control spinout where the rear end hit a guardrail and punctured the tank, there was no fire or explosion.  It was a wicked ride but nothing bad happened.  My Mustang tank is in the back of the car, as were many others.  More was made of it than should have been.
Logged
rob289c
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »