Current Classifieds

1978 RUNABOUT

Date: 04/01/2017 03:18 pm
1972 Pinto SCCA BS race car

Date: 10/23/2018 04:01 pm
Intake manifolds

Date: 03/06/2021 03:04 pm
Esslinger 2.0 intake
Date: 03/06/2017 11:58 am
1974 Ford Pinto Squire Wagon

Date: 05/30/2020 01:51 pm
door sills
Date: 03/14/2020 03:20 pm
1978 FORD PINTO PONY FOR SALE 17.000 MILES !!!!!!!!!!!!

Date: 06/25/2021 12:59 am
MISC PINTO PARTS

Date: 08/27/2017 10:23 am
Wanted 71-73 Pinto grill
Date: 03/09/2019 10:45 pm
1971 Pinto instrument cluster clear bezel WTB
Date: 03/16/2017 10:00 pm
Wanted early pinto
Date: 10/03/2019 02:42 pm
76 pinto sedan sbc/bbc project for sale $1700 obo

Date: 03/27/2017 10:07 pm

Author Topic: pinto running too rich  (Read 6038 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
pinto running too rich
« on: July 27, 2006, 01:47:18 PM »
My Pinto seems to be running too rich and I have the black smoke, crusty plugs, and a second opinion to almost confirm this. What could be out of whack with the carburetor or smog control to cause this and how do I fix it? It's a '79 2.3 with an automatic.

This could explain a couple of bonehead repairs by the previous owners to fix this. One was removing the choke butterflies (which I still haven't replaced). The other is pulling the wire out of the idle dash-pot.
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline onefarmer

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2006, 04:46:34 PM »
Unless someone opened up the jets the most likely is too high of fuel level. This could be caused by a misadjusted float level or a float that is contaminated and getting too heavy. Since both would require opening up the carb, I'd just get a kit and rebuild it. Floats are sold separately.

To properly rebuild a carb you need to soak it in a pail of carb cleaner. This will really clean it up. The spray type doesn't do the job.

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2006, 08:21:50 PM »
Thanks for the info!

BTW, would a '78 carb interchange with a '79. I got one on my '78 parts car.
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline onefarmer

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2006, 08:46:49 AM »
Not sure if it would have all the same ports and vacumm hose hookups but it will fit. They are the same basic carb. Worth a try

Offline lugnut

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • FeedBack: +14/-1
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2006, 10:54:13 AM »
Does your car have the feedback carb with an oxygen sensor on the exhaust manifold and an electronic module under the dash?

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2006, 01:19:03 PM »
Where on the manifold would the sensor be and where under the dash would the module be and where on the carb does it feedback?
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline onefarmer

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2006, 06:48:40 PM »
Does your car have the feedback carb with an oxygen sensor on the exhaust manifold and an electronic module under the dash?

Wow, haven't seen a O2 sensor on a Pinto yet. Not saying they didn't, just never seen one.

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2006, 08:01:13 PM »
If the emissions control fuse is blown, will it run rich?
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline goodolboydws

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
  • FeedBack: +17/-0

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #8 on: July 29, 2006, 10:20:36 AM »
Uhhh, you may have the cart before the horse on this one.

From '75/76 on, the car should have a catalytic convertor, and an air pump, possibly also has an 02 sensor and a feedback carburetor too. If any of these is acting up, disabled, not working at all or missing, that could be the source of some of your symptoms.  It's worth checking before looking elsewhere, especially if an engine/car has over 100,000 miles, or on ANYTHING this old.  Convertors can get plugged up with cars just having been sitting around too long also, and electrical wiring acts up more with accumulating age.

Check the easier stuff first. 

Pull the 02 sensor and check it out. Then check the air pump.   

If yours DOES have an oxygen sensor (I don't remember if the '79 did, but I suspect that it does), and the 02 sensor isn't working properly, the engine management system is typically supposed to make an engine go to a richer mixture mode when this happens as a failsafe, so that the engine doesn't run too hot. The reasoning goes that even if the engine is then running rich, it will take longer for THAT condition to cause long term damage than if it runs too lean, which can cause damage in a hurry. And maybe someone will notice what is happening and fix it before it's too late.

 For example, let's say that the 02 sensor is plugged up with carbon or the sensor wire isn't making good electrical contact.  Then the engine shifts to a richer running mode. If that is what happened, you may have noticed a decrease in fuel mileage from that point, and that's usually what people notice first, even before any performance issues.

Or, if it doesn't have properly working catalytic convertor and/or air pump and is just burning oil for example, it would tend to be running rich and the 02 sensor should be able to pick that condition up and try to correct for it. This MAY make an engine knock more evident under load, as the fuel mixture would be being leaned down to compensate for the burned oil passing through the sensor. While engine oil can be considered fuel, it doesn't burn at the same speed as gasoline, so some of it gets through the combustion chamber as unburned/partially burned and can form deposits on the plugs, 02 sensor, cat convertor, etc.

The "crusty" plugs, unless they are actually very sooty and/or oily down to the metal shell, may actually just be a "normal" accumulation of crud (from high mileage and them having not been changed or cleaned in too long a period of time), which is then being overlaid by something that started more recently. Like maybe from a bad set of plug wires or a cap/rotor problem, a weak coil, etc. causing a frequent miss.

The reason that I said a properly working convertor, is that any halfway working convertor will clean up the exhaust to the point that it would be difficult to impossible to see any smoke from oil burning, unless it was burning through oil at something like 200 miles or less per quart, and I think that you would have noticed and mentioned that.

 My wife once had a 4 cylinder car with stuck oil control rings in 2 cylinders that was burning oil at the rate of 50 miles per quart and except on very fast take offs, (the car still RAN fine) there was NO evidence of smoke in the exhaust. There was a tiny bit of carbon in the tail pipe, but hardly noticible. Her plugs did load up quickly, but they were mostly wet carbon fouling.

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2006, 12:41:01 PM »
Okay, the smog pump and the catalyst are long gone by some unknown previous owner. It doesn't knock under acceleration. How do I kludge this through until that unknown future date when I score a 2.3 turbo to drop in there?
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline onefarmer

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2006, 09:07:24 PM »
Had another thought. Perhaps the previous owner had the carb apart and switched, knowingly or not, the primary and secondary jets. The secondary is bigger and would make it run rich.

If the car has a O2 sensor as has been suggested it would be in the exhaust manifold just before the down pipe. Should be able to see it fairly easy if it has one.

A feedback carb would have a couple wires going to it attached to a solenoid somewhere around the fuel bowl. Never seen one on a Pinto so can't tell ya exactly where. Just don't mistake it for the bowl vent that would be over in the corner of the top plate. There wold be a larger vacuum hose attached in the front of the bowl vent sol.

I think I'd just drop the other carb on it just to see how it runs.

Offline goodolboydws

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
  • FeedBack: +17/-0

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2006, 10:07:20 AM »
Checking the primary and secondary jets as one farmer suggested is a very good idea.

So would be doing an engine compression and leakdown test to determine the overall efficiency of the basic engine, now BEFORE investing more time and effort in it.

Depending on how the air pump was plumbed into your engine originally, it may have been injecting air directly into the cylinder head on the downstream side of the exhaust valves, or further downstream along the system, which would promote more complete combustion in the exhaust, but in any case it would help somewhat with the smoky appearance of the exhaust simply by diluting the exhaust gases, even if a convertor was removed.

Check to see that there is at least a hose going from the valve cover to the air cleaner. (Some of the older cars had a separate line going from the crankcase to an oil vapor separator.) That would be for removing crankcase vapor and burning it.  (There may or may not be a one way PCV valve plumbed into this line.) If this line is NOT there and the valve cover is sealed the, engine will accumulate more of this internally, instead of it being burned.  Also with this line missing or plugged, some engines will not run smoothly until the idle mixture is richened significantly, as the vapor that is coming from the crankcase adds fuel to the mixture.  Try pulling the hose off with the engine running.  If the line is clear, usually that makes the engine run rougher. If not, the line or what it is attached to may be plugged. There should be some visible vapor coming out of the valve cover when you do this, but NOT much or any pressure. If there IS much pressure, that's another whole can of worms.

By the way, for your peace of mind, with the air pump and convertor removed, you will probably never be able to completely clean up the exhaust, either visually or in testing. After all that's what they are supposed to be doing, and if they weren't needed to pass the testing, you can BET that FORD would not have installed them.

If you're in an area that does NOT require exhaust testing, and the car is running decently, with decent mileage, and not using an excessive amount of oil, (using less than a quart per 500 miles or so is still considered acceptable with a high mileage engine) you may just want to let it go for now, after doing the various checks and tests mentioned in this thread.

And if it IS burning, not leaking, only a fair bit of oil (like somewhere between 400 and 1000 miles per quart), even though the compression test is good, checking the valve seals would be a reasonable thing to do. Even with an otherwise well-functioning engine, cracked/hardened valve stem seals alone can let this amount of oil through, especially if there is PRESSURE in the valve cover, which would be acting to help push the oil through the valve guides. With high rates of oil consumption past valve stem seals, a burned exhaust valve quickly becomes a high probability, so if they don't look good, replace them before it gets costly.   

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2006, 10:13:46 PM »
Found that a lot of the bad MPG problem was caused by a cracked and leaking fuel return hose back at the gas tank. Replaced both hoses there.

So what is it about Pintos and gas tank issues? :evil:

Got the carb off the parts pinto and am soaking it and will rebuild it at leisure.

'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline lugnut

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • FeedBack: +14/-1
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2006, 11:30:31 AM »
Wow, haven't seen a O2 sensor on a Pinto yet. Not saying they didn't, just never seen one.

We probably see them more out here in California.  Beginning in 1977 or 78, the 2.3s w/ Calif. emissions got a crude feedback carb.  Recognizable by: an oxygen sensor in the exhaust manifold, a bunch of colored plastic vacuum lines in place of black rubber ones, a dual vacuum operated switch on the left inner fender, and next to it a solenoid-valve that should 'clatter' on and off about twice a second when the key is on, and an electronic module about 5" square that I have seen on a '78 model mounted next to the ignition module- but on my 79 CW, its under the dash- above the hi-beam button.
  I have had to become somewhat of an 'expert' on this thing, and I can tell you that it operates like goodoldboys said- there is a blue (iirc?) vacuum line that goes to the carb, and applies about 2 or 3 inches of vacuum to a diaphram that leans out the mixture. If there is no vacuum, it goes rich. This caused my car to fail emissions for CO. The carb. is a model 6500, I believe, which is the same as the normal 5200(?) except for the added 'lean out' valve.  Its actually a pretty good system when it works, and for its era.  The one in my old 78 cruising wagon used to get nearly 30MPG.
  I'm not sure if this is your problem or not dholvrsn, beacuse I don't think that even if disconnected it goes rich to the extreme you are seeing. Also, i don't know if the feedback carb (Ford called it the "TWC" System) was used nationwide in 1979, or if it ever was.
 I hope I did not confuse you too much!
mike
 

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2006, 09:31:38 PM »
Is this the solenoid on the firewall? One of the lines is plugged. Plus the plugs that started this all. The fuse for the idiot lights and emission was blown and since replaced. The carb is soaking in the vat waiting for the parts to come in.
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline onefarmer

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2006, 09:45:51 PM »
[quote ]

The carb is soaking in the vat waiting for the parts to come in.
[/quote]

Slosh it around in there some as it soaks. Rinse it out good and if it is still dirty in some places, put it in again. I just redid one a few months ago and it took a few soaks to clean it to my liking.

Keep us up to date on how it turns out.

Offline lugnut

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • FeedBack: +14/-1
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #16 on: August 03, 2006, 12:16:35 PM »
Is this the solenoid on the firewall? One of the lines is plugged. Plus the plugs that started this all. The fuse for the idiot lights and emission was blown and since replaced. The carb is soaking in the vat waiting for the parts to come in.
Does the car have a/c? that looks like the solenoid that increases the idle when the air conditionong is turned on.

Offline dholvrsn

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #17 on: August 03, 2006, 01:35:47 PM »
Factory AC is installed. Working is another deal altogether.
'80 MPG Pony, '80-'92
'79 porthole wagon, '06-on
'80 trunk model. '17-on
-----
'98 Dodge Ram 1500
'95 Buick Riviera
'63 Studebaker Champ
'57 Studebaker Silver Hawk
'51 Studebaker Commander Starlight
'47 Studebaker Champion
'41 Studebaker Commander Land Cruiser

Offline goodolboydws

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
  • FeedBack: +17/-0

  • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: pinto running too rich
« Reply #18 on: August 03, 2006, 06:39:28 PM »
Haven't checked in for a while.
Lugnut has some good things to say. I had forgotten that my '71 was itself originally a California then Arizona car, and in that era as now, Calif. cars would frequently have emission controlled engines with systems a year or 2 in advance of the 49 state models. Plus the Canadian cars are also frequently different.

You'd be well advised to check the VIN carefully and also find the state (or Province) of original registration of your car,  to at least have a better idea of what it started out having in the way of emission controls, so that IF you need parts, you will know what is supposed to be there and what isn't. And then getting a GOOD shop manual, (preferably the Ford factory manual), if you haven't already done so. They aren't all good. It helps to know the proper information as there may also be some minor changes elsewhere on the vehicle if it is a non-49 stater or a Canadian vehicle.

You asked "what is it about Pintos and gas tank issues?"

No USA car in that era was made with fuel lines  (or vacuum lines, coolant hoses, belts, tires, or basically any partly natural rubber part, and many of the more engineeered elastomeric compound rubber products too) that were INTENDED to last 20, or 30 years. (Many/most current cars still aren't.) All of the rubber lines in the entire car should have been replaced at least once by now, and probably many of them are still the original ones. 

Knowing this doesn't mean that you HAVE to run out and replace everything rubber right away, only that if you choose not to, that you shouldn't be surprised when this type of part eventually fails. (not if)

Out of self defense over the years, I've taken to replacing a lot of older engine and safety related parts such as v-belts, hoses, timing belts, brake lines, brake parts, shocks, tires, etc. as soon as I can get to them as part of a catch up/preventative maintenance program for any older or high mileage car that we own. I concentrate on the more critical rubber stuff and fluids as a first round go through.  Saves me a lot of time, money and hassle over the long haul by preventing breakdowns that could have been anticipated and by my not having to do or having someone else do parts replacement when the vehicle is AWAY from my garage.