Current Classifieds

Pinto or Bobcat wagon wanted
Date: 08/05/2018 10:49 pm
upholstery for bucket seats
Date: 10/30/2018 08:44 am
Ignition switch 72 pinto wagon 2.0 4 sp
Date: 12/31/2017 09:03 pm
75 wagon need parts
Date: 05/28/2020 05:19 pm
Hoard of Pinto parts
Date: 12/17/2016 04:14 pm
79 pinto headlight,tailight,side marker light assemblies

Date: 07/17/2018 09:22 pm
1973 Bobcat Cruzin Wagon for Sale $4000 obo

Date: 04/13/2018 11:30 am
1976 Pinto runabout

Date: 03/28/2017 08:14 pm
WANTED: Skinny Rear Bumper w/o guards for '71 or '72 Pinto Coupe
Date: 04/24/2018 11:45 am
1978 ford pinto carb
Date: 02/04/2018 06:09 pm
Front grill for '72
Date: 03/02/2022 12:09 pm
Front sump oil pan
Date: 01/02/2017 06:54 pm

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 289/302 Crank Swap  (Read 3114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 79Minto

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Cavaliers Blow!

    • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
289/302 Crank Swap
« on: October 27, 2003, 11:58:28 AM »
Okay I need some help ???  I was wondering if I took the 302 Crank,Rods, and put them in a 289 block bored .30 with 289 heads if I would need any special type of Pistons? Would it reach top dead center or slap the plugs? I plan on going with 1 point up on the compression ratio with the pistons. Lowwww Budget for now.
Logged

Offline straw boss

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • FeedBack: +27/-0
  • Gender: Male

    • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re:289/302 Crank Swap
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2003, 03:33:09 PM »
That should work with no problems, assuming you will not use domed pistons.  I believe the 289 has smaller combustion chambers than the 302.
 Both engines have a deck height of 8.206".  
The compression height for the pistons in both motors is 1.605".  The .130" longer stroke of the 302 is used with the .065"shorter rod to keep the compression height identical.
(Info from a Ford Motorsport catalog)
Logged
'80 Sedan, 2.3, EFI, Electromotive TEC3, 75 shot N2O, Esslinger Alum. D port head, 5 speed, 3.55, 15x7 Mustang "10 hole" rims.  Continual project.

Offline 79Minto

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Cavaliers Blow!

    • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re:289/302 Crank Swap
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2003, 03:41:08 PM »
But if I used 289 Rods and 302 Crank in a 302 block I would have a problem because 289 Rods are longer Eh? Thanks for the Help
Logged

Offline straw boss

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • FeedBack: +27/-0
  • Gender: Male

    • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re:289/302 Crank Swap
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2003, 05:42:04 PM »
Yes.  You would have to make up the difference with some custom pistons with a compression height of 1.54" (1.605-.065).  That really wouldn't be the best approach if you want to keep the costs down.
Logged
'80 Sedan, 2.3, EFI, Electromotive TEC3, 75 shot N2O, Esslinger Alum. D port head, 5 speed, 3.55, 15x7 Mustang "10 hole" rims.  Continual project.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »