PINTO CAR CLUB of AMERICA

Shiny is Good! => Your Project => Topic started by: Tonycando on November 13, 2014, 09:54:45 PM

Title: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on November 13, 2014, 09:54:45 PM
Hi everyone
New to this site I am
I sold my 64 Fairlane last winter thinking its time to stay out of the car game,didn't last very long when I came across a 71 which I am installing one of my race prepped Cleveland's .
I ordered my headers through Jegs and got lucky,apparently I got the last set of Hedman Hustler swap headers made for this swap,I just ordered a front plate to mount the engine but I am exhausted looking for a oil pan that should work for this swap,is one out there for the Cleveland into a Pinto swap ?
I'll try to post a few pics soon of the subframe connectors we installed and are just finishing patching the floor.
Thanks
 Tony
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on November 14, 2014, 04:39:40 AM
Top two are used for the 302w & 351w, so the third one down should be the same deal # 30927

http://www.milodon.com/oil-pans/street-oil-pans-ford73.asp

I've checked the 302w pan on newer blocks. Only difference is the dip stick. Have to use the chain cover with the dip stick, and plug the hole in the block on newer ones.

With the Headers you have, you should bolt them to the engine & see if there will be clearance between for the pan flare.

You'll want to protect those rare Headers as well......what springs did you use ?

BTW folks, if Tony is the guy I'm thinking, he is a fellow Canadian  ;D
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on November 19, 2014, 07:58:41 PM
Yes sir its me.
I'm not sure which springs are in it so I'll have to get some weight in the front and see how the ride height is,it used to have a 302 in it years back but the previous owner really didn't know much of what is upgraded with the springs.
Will that pan clear the manual rack system ? If not I might as well just fab something up.
Does anyone know what 90/10 shock will fit on the front,no one lists them for the 71.
Nasty nasty nasty is the only way to describe how this car is going to be if it hooks up,I am planning on running the Caltracs system .
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on November 20, 2014, 04:42:12 AM
That pan should clear. Built the same way the ones for 302w & 351w.

OEM pans bend down too soon. It's this area that hits the pan.
If you have the skills to mod a pan, that will work as well.

For me, it wasn't worth my time to mod one when a good race pan is available.
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on November 20, 2014, 08:41:02 PM
Well from their measurements it looks like the width will work but the length will be tight,I ordered it through Jegs and see how it works.
Does anyone know what race shock is available for the 71 in a 90/10 or what is the differance for the 74 pinto cause that seems to be as far back as they will go.
Thanks
  Tony
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on November 21, 2014, 04:48:37 AM
At one time I was looking for the 90/10 shocks. Never did find any that said "for Pinto" (71 - 73).

I did find info that folks are using different types now.
Never got round to asking those that know.

If you have a good parts guy, measure the stroke you want, top pin, bottom eye & they should be able to match something up for you.
Last time I did this was in the early 70s.....

On my white B2 there are Koni  adjustable, front & back. I have seen the backs for sale not long ago. I'd have to get the number off of the fronts to check for them.

If you do find 90/10s, please post them.


Quote
Nasty nasty nasty is the only way to describe how this car is going to be if it hooks up,I am planning on running the Caltracs system .

You gunna need wheely bars as well  ;D
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 08, 2014, 08:36:18 PM
Well I got the Milodon 30927 pan,no way is it going to fit the rear of the pan is the same as a stock stamped pan and is just dropped down from the stock sump.
Bummer I really didn't want to build one for this car.

Tony
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on December 09, 2014, 05:13:38 AM
Just had a closer look at the 351c pan. I think I see what you mean.
The transition from the shallow end to the sump curves down , where with the 351w & 302w pans end sharply at the sump (allowing fitment over the rack).

Wonder if you could mod that new (or old) pan to replicate this sharp drop ?
Something in the engine preventing this mod ?
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 09, 2014, 08:39:52 AM
I guess that's what I'll be looking at this week end,I was really hoping for a bolt on solution but oh well.at least I got lucky with the headers.
I have the block heads and headers along with the trans mocked up in there now,I am kind of setting it all up allowing clearances I need with the headers,the measurement I get from the oil pan rail on the block to the rack is from 3 1/2" to a max of 4"'s and the factory pan is 4 1/2" .so cut chop weld it is.
The pic they have of this pan definately not represent what they sent me.
I've seen a couple of Cleveland's in Pinto's on line running this pan and although questions were asked how they made it work the questions were never responded to.

Tony

Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: russosborne on December 09, 2014, 10:37:40 AM
Do you have any pictures?
I am going to be doing this with my 74, and although they aren't exactly the same up front it might be a big help to see how you are doing this.
Thanks,
Russ
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 10, 2014, 07:36:30 PM
Do you have any pictures?
I am going to be doing this with my 74, and although they aren't exactly the same up front it might be a big help to see how you are doing this.
Thanks,
Russ

I wil post pics,just since my last Ipad update I can't seem to post pics with the iPad,once I get it figured I i will post lots of pics.

Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: russosborne on December 10, 2014, 09:59:36 PM
Thanks.
No rush  on my part, the Pinto is on hold for a bit while I am getting my new daily driver 72 Ranchero (yes, with a 351C) sorted out.
Russ
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 14, 2014, 07:05:00 PM
Couple of pics
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on December 23, 2014, 05:27:45 AM
Hope you do not mind.... ?

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v140/DerrickJB/Cars/image_zps5f5e0a91.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/DerrickJB/media/Cars/image_zps5f5e0a91.jpg.html)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v140/DerrickJB/Cars/2_zps943cfdda.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/DerrickJB/media/Cars/2_zps943cfdda.jpg.html)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v140/DerrickJB/Cars/3_zpsc97a00b2.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/DerrickJB/media/Cars/3_zpsc97a00b2.jpg.html)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v140/DerrickJB/Cars/4_zps85ecb08c.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/DerrickJB/media/Cars/4_zps85ecb08c.jpg.html)
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on December 23, 2014, 05:36:22 AM
Looks like the Lakewood 1520 bell ? For the big 164 tooth fly wheel ?

Details on sub frames ? Tubing size, wall thickness ?
Did you go right through to the tail lights ?

Plans for diff ?

Looks like it's going to be tight for your gas peddle.
May I suggest trying to obtain the peddle bracket & peddles out of a 74^ car. If you need to mod them, there are more of them , than the 71/72 that are getting hard to find.

Engine mods ? Looks to me to be a stoutly built 351C !

Building your own cage ? If not, who you getting to build it ?
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 23, 2014, 06:28:05 PM
Looks like the Lakewood 1520 bell ? For the big 164 tooth fly wheel ?

Details on sub frames ? Tubing size, wall thickness ?
Did you go right through to the tail lights ?

Plans for diff ?

Looks like it's going to be tight for your gas peddle.
May I suggest trying to obtain the peddle bracket & peddles out of a 74^ car. If you need to mod them, there are more of them , than the 71/72 that are getting hard to find


Engine mods ? Looks to me to be a stoutly built 351C !

Building your own cage ? If not, who you getting to build it ?

One day I'm going to find out how to fixed those pics lol thanks a bunch
Yes for the 164 tooth flywheel
If you look closely at the pic you can see I welded a 1x2 heavy wall against the rocker panel,it extended all the way to the front spring mount and fit between the spring mound and the rocker panel perfectly and it is all welded together.
Than I ran with the same material across the width of the car from the front of the spring mounts,all welded together into the rocker panel 1x2 and the spring mount brackets all welded in solid.
The connectors are 2x3" I believe 3/16 thick,they tie into at the rear those 1x2's and are gusseted to the front factory frame.
The motor is a 351 cleveland ,aluminum rods,Arias 12.5 Pistons and a 670" lift solid roller.
Still looking at 9" options but will be 31 spline 3:89 geared
As far as the cage goes I might do it myself but there are kit options I've been looking at and just do the install myself,if not there is a guy Dan Lee in High River who could do it for me.

I had a fellow see my pedals wanted add and he emailed me letting me know he had a set for sale from a 71 he built years ago,he told me to look at the pics carefully cause he heated them to move them over a bit for his cleveland with 4spd  Install,I have not put them in yet but I've been installing the seat and making sure the gas pedal and my big foot has room,so far so good.


Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 23, 2014, 06:37:34 PM
This is the base I speak of that the back of the subframe. Connectors ties into
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 23, 2014, 06:41:04 PM
Ahhhhhhh it sideways again.  Dang it
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on December 23, 2014, 07:25:26 PM
 ;D


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v140/DerrickJB/Cars/5ish_zpsafb91cf7.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/DerrickJB/media/Cars/5ish_zpsafb91cf7.jpg.html)


In the 3rd picture, the one with an engine sitting in the car. What is the intake for ? Reason I ask is the water neck....
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 23, 2014, 07:35:50 PM
Nope no water neck,that is Weiand tunnel ram cleveland specific.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on December 23, 2014, 07:40:09 PM
Couldn't tell for sure in the little pictures.
Made it bigger on my computer, but it got real blurry.....

Hard to find ? Don't see many listed anyplace.

Plan for tubs ?

Cage be 8.5 cert ?
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on December 23, 2014, 08:33:52 PM
Couldn't tell for sure in the little pictures.
Made it bigger on my computer, but it got real blurry.....

Hard to find ? Don't see many listed anyplace.

Plan for tubs ?

Cage be 8.5 cert ?

They are still out there and come across them on fleebay once in awhile.
The wheel wells are only going to get widened at the front area where they come in at a angle,and the cage I have planed is a 8 point at this time maybe more if my thoughts come through to fruition to cut out the front inner fenders.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on December 24, 2014, 08:36:43 AM
Engine Weight and Dimension Comparison
               --------------------------------------

The following numbers come from an early Ford catalog and are for
"typical" engines.  The dimensions include such things as air cleaners, oil
filters, water pump fan, etc., but not bellhousings.

               Engine    Width Length Height Weight

               289-302W  24.0  29.0   27.5   460
               302 Boss  24.5  29.0   28.5   500
               351W      25.0  29.0   29.0   525
               351C      25.5  29.0   29.0   550
               351M-400  26.0  29.0   29.0   575

       Heads       
 

       50.0 lbs  289/302 - complete including rockers
       56.5 lbs  351C 2bbl open chamber - bare
       58.0 lbs  351C 2bbl open chamber - complete except for rockers
       60.0 lbs  351C 4bbl closed chamber - bare
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on January 30, 2015, 02:46:53 PM
Well things should be easier with the purchSe of a complete running parts car. Kind of cute isn't  it.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: dga57 on January 30, 2015, 03:43:36 PM
Looks rather nice to be parting out! ???


Dwayne
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on January 30, 2015, 04:33:53 PM
Looks rather nice to be parting out! ???


Dwayne

It's a 2 ltr OHC  that smokes 4 spd car,both doors ore completely rotten,quarters are rusted through,parts are so hard to find I'm finding out for the 1971 that there really are no other options out there but to take this one apart and use what I need and than see if anyone else needs parts to complete there own restoration.

Unless someone comes along and tells me this is a ultra rare model deserving a redo

Thanks
 Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: dga57 on January 31, 2015, 08:17:51 AM
Nope, don't see anything particularly rare about it; just looked decent in the photo.  I agree with you that a parts car can be a valuable asset!


Dwayne :)
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: dianne on January 31, 2015, 09:18:54 AM
WOW that car is beautiful! I LOVE the yellow!
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on February 06, 2015, 08:55:00 PM
Moving the front of the inner rear wheel well for more clearance. Before and after pics.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on February 07, 2015, 05:01:35 PM
I may have asked before... ?

You opening the wheel wells up for taller than 26" tires ?
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on February 07, 2015, 05:52:55 PM
I am shooting for a 28"11.5 tire
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: fozzy on February 07, 2015, 07:04:51 PM
Lookin' good! I did the exact same thing in the front of my wheel wells last winter..
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on February 07, 2015, 08:22:05 PM
Lookin' good! I did the exact same thing in the front of my wheel wells last winter..


Have you done any tire fitment 

Thanks
  Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on February 11, 2015, 09:00:14 PM
Second wheel well moved in checked off the list, time to put my feet up and have a Ford and Mercury moment. Lol
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: fozzy on February 11, 2015, 11:50:01 PM

Have you done any tire fitment 

Thanks
  Tony

I've got 275/50/15 ET street radials sitting under mine.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on February 12, 2015, 08:51:48 AM
I've got 275/50/15 ET street radials sitting under mine.

Is that with stock axel width,also would you mind sharing you your wheel width and offset please

Thanks
 Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: fozzy on February 13, 2015, 08:35:35 PM
Is that with stock axel width,also would you mind sharing you your wheel width and offset please

Thanks
 Tony

I'll measure the diff axle flange to axle flange over the weekend and get the wheel info too..
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 07, 2015, 06:20:54 PM
Well the Caltracs are here now,was hoping my springs would be ok but to no avail cause they are broke. Now I'm waiting for the split mono leaf springs from Caltracs also so watch for some pics of their install.
Also started building my own back brace for the 9" after its welded up its off to sandblast to clean it up 
That should take care of the rear and I desided to go with the Strange front brake kit, it fits the drum spindle and is better priced than Wilwood by enough to make me happy.
Still hope to fire this beast up in six weeks.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on March 07, 2015, 07:29:48 PM
Making good time !
Started 4 years after me & will have yours going long before mine !
Looking forward to some video of this Beast of yours on the track !
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 07, 2015, 07:57:01 PM
Making good time !
Started 4 years after me & will have yours going long before mine !
Looking forward to some video of this Beast of yours on the track !

I won't have the body done this year,I really want to just get it out and have some fun this summer,body work is a great next winter project,perfect for those cold Alberta winter days we get sometimes.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on March 07, 2015, 08:30:38 PM
Sort of the same plan for me : depends on how bad the economy / work gets here.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: fozzy on March 11, 2015, 08:18:55 PM
Hi Tony, sorry it took me so long to post the info.. With this set up the tires tuck nicely inside the wheel opening. I did have to move the leaf springs inboard to clear the inside sidewall of the tires..
Ford 9" 58 1/4" flange to flange

Weld Wheels (Draglite) 90-58350, 15 in. x 8 in.

5 x 4.5/4.75 in. Bolt Circle

5.5 in. Backspace

Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 12, 2015, 12:19:19 PM
Hi Tony, sorry it took me so long to post the info.. With this set up the tires tuck nicely inside the wheel opening. I did have to move the leaf springs inboard to clear the inside sidewall of the tires..
Ford 9" 58 1/4" flange to flange

Weld Wheels (Draglite) 90-58350, 15 in. x 8 in.

5 x 4.5/4.75 in. Bolt Circle

5.5 in. Backspace

Thanks for that info,I test fit a 15x8 with 4.5" backspace with a old L60/15" tire and it just clears and only have 3/4" between the spring and the tire so I can see why you moved your springs.
My Caltracs with split mono leaf has arrived and I plan to install it this weekend along with my tire combo,I'll post pics of how it all fits.

Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 27, 2015, 07:48:47 PM
Ok now I have the 9" installed,I had to move ever so slight the pin holes in the 57 fairlane diff by 3/16" on either side other wise it pushed the leifs springs out enough to bind the Caltracs on the front spring perch.
Rebuilt the 8" brakes and put it all together with the 28/11.5 MT ET Streets which I might say fit tighter than a nuns nickers. The rims I am using are 15x8 with a 5.5" back space and I need to use quarter inch spacers to keep the tire from rubbing the springs. But I think it looks dam nasty.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on March 27, 2015, 08:50:18 PM
Looking forward to hearing how it kooks up.
Nice clean set up !
Surprised you got 28" tires in that small hole.
My diff is mounted a bit more forward than yours & I can only get a 26" tire in.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 27, 2015, 10:59:11 PM
Looking forward to hearing how it kooks up.
Nice clean set up !
Surprised you got 28" tires in that small hole.
My diff is mounted a bit more forward than yours & I can only get a 26" tire in.

It is quite tight at the front,about a 1/2" clearance so I will be moving the wheel well and rocker a little,with a little more welding I should have it back on the ground this weekend and see how it sits and measure for rear shocks,Calvert Racing said they might not be able to supply a shock but I'll measure it up and find out on Monday..

Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: 76hotrodpinto on March 28, 2015, 10:23:48 AM
I like! Is that mono spring setup with the traction bars compatible with the m2 8" rear end?
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 28, 2015, 04:30:09 PM
I like! Is that mono spring setup with the traction bars compatible with the m2 8" rear end?


They do have the bottom mount for a 8" diff as well,one issue I might have is where they have the lower shock mount positioned it puts the shock closer to the axel tube,they did tell me if I have any interference that they would make me a new lower mount,I'll keep everyone in the loop but so far Calvert has been great to deal with.

Tony
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 29, 2015, 01:13:24 AM
The one company I will not use again is Currie,I ordered there 31 spline axel package,they asked what diff and what it's out of for the seals,they sent the wrong ones and when I phoned them on it they said there are 4 different kinds.
That would have been a great thing to let me know first hand so one doesn't have to wait another 2 weeks for seals,also no access hole to remove the retainer bolts,again they said I should have asked for them.hell yet every pic on there site shows the hole and even the factory axel has them.
All in all very disappointed in them.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: 76hotrodpinto on March 29, 2015, 07:29:59 AM
Sounds like you got a counter person that just wasn't pushing their products correctly. I've had pretty good luck with them, only 1 return, and that was my fault.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on March 29, 2015, 10:00:52 AM
Sounds like you got a counter person that just wasn't pushing their products correctly. I've had pretty good luck with them, only 1 return, and that was my fault.


Its the  you should have asked attitude that sealed the deal for me,I've used Strange on other projects and I guess I'll go back.never had any issues with Strange but thought I would try someone else.never again..
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on January 29, 2017, 09:02:48 PM
Well I got the QA1 adjustable shock and 600 lb springs installed and the Strange disk brake kit,I am very happy with both kits.the disk kit was a very simple bolt on solution..
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on January 29, 2017, 09:04:03 PM
Sorry about the sideways pics guys .
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: 74 PintoWagon on January 30, 2017, 06:34:46 AM
Looks good..
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: fozzy on June 20, 2017, 09:18:20 AM
Well from their measurements it looks like the width will work but the length will be tight,I ordered it through Jegs and see how it works.
Does anyone know what race shock is available for the 71 in a 90/10 or what is the differance for the 74 pinto cause that seems to be as far back as they will go.
Thanks
  Tony

Hi Tony, have you had any luck with finding 90/10 shocks?
I've been talking to Chris Alston chassis works about double adjustable shocks for my '71 and think we have it narrowed down. I measured the shocks that were in my car and we went from there.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on June 26, 2017, 06:20:52 AM
Thank you for the up date !

Look forward to more........so on !
Title: Re: 1971 wit a Cleveland install
Post by: Tonycando on August 19, 2017, 11:38:41 PM
Hi Tony, have you had any luck with finding 90/10 shocks?
I've been talking to Chris Alston chassis works about double adjustable shocks for my '71 and think we have it narrowed down. I measured the shocks that were in my car and we went from there.

I do apologize I've not kept up with this,I gave up trying to find the 90/10,s
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: dick1172762 on August 22, 2017, 10:29:03 AM
C2639 Competion Engineering Drag race shocks state in their ad that their 3 way adjustable shocks are 90-10 on one of the 3 settings. Its there in black and white. Read the ad.
Title: Re: 1971 with a Cleveland install
Post by: Reeves1 on August 23, 2017, 05:15:07 AM
https://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/cee-2639/overview/

I too had searched all over & had never found them.......