Current Classifieds

1976-1979 FORD PINTO BOBCAT FRONT HOOD TRIM MOLDING D4FZ-16856-A OEM EXCELLENT

Date: 09/22/2020 11:33 pm
1977 Pinto Cruizin Wagon

Date: 04/11/2024 03:56 pm
parting out 1975 & 80 pintos
Date: 08/24/2018 02:50 pm
Ford 2.3 Bellhousing C4/C5 & Torque Converter

Date: 07/08/2022 11:51 pm
 (3) 1980 Ford Pinto Station Wagon Projects

Date: 03/15/2023 02:16 pm
Wagon hatch letters
Date: 12/31/2023 04:24 pm
Clutch Cable Needed
Date: 04/03/2017 10:54 pm
74 Pinto wagon armrests
Date: 01/18/2017 07:04 pm
1975 Ford Pinto

Date: 01/13/2020 11:02 am
1973 Pinto Runabout

Date: 03/25/2019 09:02 pm
1978 PINTO PONY FOR SALE 17,000 ORIGINAL MILES !!!!!!!
Date: 10/10/2019 10:02 pm
Lower Alternator bracket
Date: 08/26/2017 05:11 pm

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: What Would I Need to Install this T-5?  (Read 2372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Henrius

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • Three Pillars blog

    • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Webmaster Tenth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Windows User Apple User Fifth year Anniversary
What Would I Need to Install this T-5?
« on: April 09, 2014, 12:02:47 PM »
A mechanic friend of mine was going to give me a Borg-Warner T-5 from a Chevy S-10. He said he has searched all his parts books and cannot find a bell housing for the T-5 that will fit the Pinto 2.0 liter motor.


I need to know if I should take this tranny from him (offered for free!), and what parts I would need to adapt it to my 1973 Pinto with a 2.0 liter and 4 speed.


Kim Henry


henrius@mindsapring.com
Logged
1973 Pinto Runabout with upgraded 2.0 liter & 4 speed, and factory sunroof. My first car, now restored, and better than it was when it rolled off the assembly line!

Offline Pinto5.0

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1974
  • FeedBack: +77/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 80 hatch, 76 Wagon, 72 & 73 Sedans, 71 half hatch

    • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Fifth year Anniversary Windows User 1000 Posts
Re: What Would I Need to Install this T-5?
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2014, 02:17:08 PM »
It wont fit. I forget the list of reasons but a few are wrong input shaft, mounting pad, shifter location & driveshaft yoke. There are more reasons besides those. Also the T5 overdrive is nearly useless behind a stock 2.0 unless you want to run a steeper rear gear
Logged
'73 Sedan (I'll get to it)
'76 Wagon driver
'80 hatch(Restoring to be my son's 1st car)~Callisto
'71 half hatch (bucket list Pinto)~Ghost
'72 sedan 5.0/T5~Lemon Squeeze

Offline Henrius

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • Three Pillars blog

    • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Webmaster Tenth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Windows User Apple User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: What Would I Need to Install this T-5?
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2014, 10:55:21 AM »
It isn't a stock 2.0. I significantly increased HP.


What is it about this S-10 T-5 that is different than the other T-5 conversions I see on this forum?


Is it that one T-5 was built to fit a 2.3 liter in the Mustang, and also happens to fit the 2.0 in the Pinto?
Logged
1973 Pinto Runabout with upgraded 2.0 liter & 4 speed, and factory sunroof. My first car, now restored, and better than it was when it rolled off the assembly line!

Offline dick1172762

  • Vintage Pinto Racer
  • PCCA Management Board
  • Pinto Sr. Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2623
  • FeedBack: +362/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!

    • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: What Would I Need to Install this T-5?
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2014, 11:42:02 AM »
S-10 has a LOW first gear for pulling stumps out of the ground like a good truck should. Get one out of a Fox body Mustang and the bell housing will fit a 2.0L with step dowel pins.
Logged
Its better to be a has-been, than a never was.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »