Current Classifieds

1973 Pinto 2.3 4 speed transmission. Tube frame roadster frame (roller). 1971 Pinto 2.0 radiator.
Date: 09/05/2018 06:30 pm
1973 Interior parts wanted
Date: 01/02/2017 11:02 pm
72 Pinto parts
Date: 11/14/2019 10:46 pm
Oil pan front sump style
Date: 01/10/2017 09:19 am
Early Rare Small window hatch
Date: 08/16/2017 08:26 am
1978 RUNABOUT

Date: 04/01/2017 03:18 pm
Tubing bender 1/2 to 2 1/2 (3) inch roll cage / mufflers and more

Date: 03/13/2021 12:57 pm
looking for 1978 pinto head rebuild kit
Date: 05/24/2020 08:19 am
79 pinto front,rear alum bumpers

Date: 07/17/2018 09:49 pm
72 pinto and 88 turbo coupe

Date: 06/09/2016 04:13 am
Wanted 2.3 engine mount brackets and mounts
Date: 02/14/2018 01:34 am
Wanted - 71-73 Pinto grill
Date: 12/15/2016 03:32 pm

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan  (Read 5347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Windows User
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« on: April 11, 2013, 02:18:31 PM »
Are they the same?

thanks
Logged

Offline Fred Morgan

  • RETIRED- PCCA Trusted Parts Vendor
  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
  • FeedBack: +342/-0
  • Gender: Male

    • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:25 PM »
NO .
Logged
Fred Morgan- Missing from us...
January 20th 1951-January 6th 2014

Beloved PCCA Parts Supplier and Friend to many.
Post your well wishes,
http://www.fordpinto.com/in-memory-of-our-fallen-pinto-heros/fred-morgan-23434/

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

    • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2013, 09:40:36 PM »
Are you talking about the 2.0 EAO motor and the 2.3 Pinto motor ? No. Are you talking about the 2.0 and the 2.3 Ranger motor ? Yes....The Ranger had the same motor just debored and destroked from the 2.3. Are you talking about the 2.3 Mazda ? No. The 2.3 HSC front wheel drive engine ? No..Hope this helps...Rememb er for the Pinto 2.3  has a front  sump oil pan and the Rangers etc had a rear oil sump pan. So use only the one for a 2.3 Pinto motor. They are out there.
Logged

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Windows User
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:05 AM »
Wagon is a 72 2.0 4 speed.  Wanting to install T2.3/ T5 from Turbo Coupe.  Presently in an 87 Mustang/ 24 hours of Lemons car.  It looks like I need at minimum:  Pan, Pickup, mounts.  Mustang driveshaft will work w/ different yoke/ujoint?

Car already has 8" rear.

i also posted about a Zetec conversion, if anyone's heard of one of them being done....
Logged

Offline 74turbowagon

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
I'm currently try to do the same swap but in a 74 wagon
Logged

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

    • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2013, 10:20:55 PM »
Sir Thomas check the over all length of the Mustang drive shaft.With the one you have. It should work without doing any cutting all you need is to remove the  slip yoke from your Pinto drive shaft and change the U joints from a 1310 to 1330 hybrid and add the T-5 slip yoke. But I'm not 100% sure.  I have heard about cutting the T-5 drive shaft to fit. You also will have to do somethingalbou t your cooling system as the 2.3 engine is longer. The 2.0's have a straight mount for the radiator and the 2.3 have a kick out. Some have moved the radiatorby mounting  it forward etc. As for 74 turbowagon yes you need the complete T-5 ,drive shaft, engine , EEC wiring harness , Exhaust (No your 1 3/4" or 2.0 " will not work) etc. But to really make things work you need to keep the following from your car. The oil pan, oil dip stick, oil pick up, mounts and add T-5 trans mount to the old trans mount from your Pinto...You will also need a set of pedals for a Pinto if your car is an automatic to add the clutch. No a Mustang set from the downer car will not work....There is allot of info here and of course at Turboford.org but not at turbopinto it's not working...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »