PINTO CAR CLUB of AMERICA

Welcome to FordPinto.com, The home of the PCCA => Member Polls => Topic started by: pimpin_pinto on July 06, 2004, 12:01:45 AM

Title: Engine Poll
Post by: pimpin_pinto on July 06, 2004, 12:01:45 AM
I've had a lot of time on my ands due to summer break, and i've been saving up, so i've been thinking about engines.
Title: Re:Engine Poll
Post by: pimpin_pinto on July 08, 2004, 03:13:34 AM
can you still get a restpectable amount of power out of the 2.3 naturally aspirated?  Mostly I've heard that they are only powerful with turbos.
Title: Re:Engine Poll
Post by: pbwagon on July 10, 2004, 09:58:43 AM
302 or 5.0L now that is a tough choice.....or perhaps not. ;D
Title: Re:Engine Poll
Post by: pimpin_pinto on July 10, 2004, 12:16:29 PM
carbed 302, or the fuel injected 5.0 :P
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: txnnny on March 26, 2013, 01:11:51 PM
Has anyone considered a 2011 up Mustang 3.7 and 6 speed?  305 HP, over 30 mpg.  There is room for the 3.5 Eco Boost for that matter, more $$$.  The 3.7 should put a Pinto solid into the 12's and still get over 30 mpg! 
UPDATE:  Found an afordable 3.7 with the 6 speed manual.  Looks like the 2.0 4 speed is adios. Well, after I make more progress on the house remodel, and the 54 F100 panel (4.6 mk 8, '06 crown vic front suspension) 67 ranchero, 65 F100 SW 390 5 speed, 78 el camino, I got weak, 27 TTouring project only so far, and back to the 72 Runabout.  DD is ford edge. 
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: half pint on March 27, 2013, 08:45:00 AM
Well, if you're going V8, I'd say a 306 or 347 with efi backed by a T56.  But, i think the Mustang's 3.7 (as mentioned above) would be cool...or, what about the NEW 2.3 that came in the 06-12 Ranger? My buddy had an 07 XL 2wd rcsb with the 2.3 and a 5-speed and let me tell ya, that truck would get down...i can only imagine that in a lighter Pinto.  Now, when i say that, i mean electronics, fuel injection and all swapped in...i love retrofitting newer elements into older cars and making it look factory...can you imagine? A stock looking Pinto, hopping in, firing it up and still hearing the familiar 2.3 under the hood purring like a kitten, with no drivability issues, getting 30+ mpg like its nothing and moving the Pinto like its never moved before...all while appearing stock...man, now I'm daydreaming at work again!

Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: dga57 on March 27, 2013, 01:32:03 PM
i love retrofitting newer elements into older cars and making it look factory...can you imagine? A stock looking Pinto, hopping in, firing it up and still hearing the familiar 2.3 under the hood purring like a kitten, with no drivability issues, getting 30+ mpg like its nothing and moving the Pinto like its never moved before...all while appearing stock...man, now I'm daydreaming at work again!



Sounds like a winner to me!!!
Dwayne :)
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: 75bobcatv6 on April 02, 2013, 05:01:49 AM
Has anyone considered a 2011 up Mustang 3.7 and 6 speed?  305 HP, over 30 mpg.  There is room for the 3.5 Eco Boost for that matter, more $$$.  The 3.7 should put a Pinto solid into the 12's and still get over 30 mpg!


the wife and i have been toying with this lol
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: jonz2pinto on April 29, 2014, 05:42:22 PM
as far as stock goes the 2.0 in early sedans were fastest to me. 2.8 w/4speed 3.40gears(in either) in early sedan would be sweet.   
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: jburt on May 04, 2014, 07:02:58 PM
Being an old codger geezer with a DIY attitude and creaky joints , I'm looking for an upgrade for the 2.3L that has more power and mileage and is a basic bolt in.
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: Srt on May 05, 2014, 03:14:11 AM
(http://i490.photobucket.com/albums/rr268/3798j/0-0A-Allison-PopularMechanics-Feb1947.jpg)
should bolt right in.  maybe a little 'snip' here & there.
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: dianne on May 05, 2014, 07:20:09 AM
Anyone ever see one of these?
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: 74 PintoWagon on May 05, 2014, 07:57:31 AM
Seen quite a few of them, could have bought one for a $100 once but didn't have anything to put it in, lol.. Guy I know restored a classic a while back.

http://classiccustomboats.com/salton-sea-monsters (http://classiccustomboats.com/salton-sea-monsters)
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: 65ShelbyClone on May 07, 2014, 10:17:06 AM
Those Allisons are/were somewhat popular with tractor pullers. Seems like a waste to me.

Anyway, I voted for the 5.0L and would have voted the 2.3T as a second. The right mix of stock 2.3T parts can be pushed to ~300rwhp when you really turn the screws, but beyond that it's not cheaper than upgrading a 5.0L until the 5.0L block becomes a serious liability(~500rwhp).

The 2.3T is easier to put in a Pinto, though. That's what I want to eventually put in mine.
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: jeremysdad on May 13, 2014, 05:41:34 PM
as far as stock goes the 2.0 in early sedans were fastest to me. 2.8 w/4speed 3.40gears(in either) in early sedan would be sweet.   

I'm insane, so I'm sticking with the 2.0. :) Wish mine was a 4 speed (at least), as it does like to wind out. Overdrive would be nice, though, for the commute to work. :)
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: arizonabob on October 04, 2014, 09:10:51 PM
jonz2Pinto mentioned " 2.8w/4speed..." Question... will the Pinto 4 speed bolt up to a 2.8? if not, what will?
Title: Re: Engine Poll
Post by: dick1172762 on October 05, 2014, 10:15:52 AM
Anyone ever see one of these?
    First engine I ever worked on in the Air Force in 1952.