Current Classifieds

WTB: Factory air cleaner and fan shroud 1971 2.0
Date: 02/05/2020 11:06 am
1978 RUNABOUT

Date: 04/01/2017 03:18 pm
Wanted: Oil Breather F0ZZ6A485A "87-8 from 2.3L Turbo
Date: 08/06/2021 02:23 pm
pinto for sale
Date: 09/11/2016 09:47 pm
74 Pinto Wagon Squire.Bright blue

Date: 06/30/2018 09:48 am
MISC PINTO PARTS

Date: 08/27/2017 10:23 am
1972 Runabout 351 Cleveland V8

Date: 11/05/2016 09:03 pm
Looking for oil dipstick and tube 2.3L
Date: 11/23/2017 05:44 pm
Clutch Cable Needed
Date: 04/03/2017 10:54 pm
1978 need kick panels and rear hatch struts and upper and lower mounts
Date: 11/29/2018 10:26 am
Need 77 or 78 Cruising Wagon Speedometer Tachometer Assembly
Date: 06/24/2020 06:12 am
New front rotors and everything for '74-'80
Date: 08/02/2019 04:18 pm

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978  (Read 1346 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 74WagonMeadowGreen

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« on: February 21, 2012, 03:33:14 PM »
When I first brought my 52000 mile original 1978 Pinto home I soon discovered the rear seals leaked, along with a few other rubber-related items failing. I went about replacing everything questionable with so-far good success. However, I replaced my rear seals with 3214 units. Months later, when replacing the master cylinder and booster, I noticed my NEW seals leaking all over. Since the time I had done that job I learned that although the number 3214 (National, Federal Mogul, etc.) seal is indicated to be the proper replacement, IT IS NOT!! According to dimensions, the inner diameter is listed around 1.3 inches... the true axle diameter at the contact point is 1.25 in. I also discovered that the CORRECT seal is number 3199, with a correct, 1.25 Inner diameter. Please do not make my mistake... use the 3199 if you do not like doing a reseal after only weeks!! This info has probably already been submitted, but I figured a reminder would not hurt!
Logged

Offline 74WagonMeadowGreen

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
Re: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 01:34:53 PM »
One addition... Does anyone know what the difference between a 3199 and a 3199S is? Is there any? According to the Timken book, the physical dimensions are identical... is the "S" a different material?
Logged

Offline FB71

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Old Ford homeless shelter

    • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
Re: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2012, 02:32:07 PM »
most likely a different material. Perhaps silicon instead of nitrile rubber.
Logged
Jim

Offline 74WagonMeadowGreen

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
Re: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2012, 02:47:51 PM »
That makes sense... I figured it might also be Timken's way of leading you to think it was something special just to charge more... S = Sucker !!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »