Current Classifieds

Wanted '75 Bobcat Instrument Cluster & Wiring Harness
Date: 12/09/2018 06:59 am
Wagon hatch letters
Date: 12/31/2023 04:24 pm
t-5 2.3 trans and new flywheel cluch and pressure plate though out bearing for sale
Date: 09/09/2018 03:22 pm
PINTO TRUNK LATCH & CATCH

Date: 03/23/2018 09:39 pm
77 Caliper Bolt
Date: 08/21/2018 04:02 pm
Parting out 77 Bobcat Hatch
Date: 11/06/2017 04:16 pm
MISC PINTO PARTS

Date: 08/27/2017 10:23 am
1971 Pinto (survivor)

Date: 05/15/2022 04:42 pm
71-73 2.0 4 speed transmission wanted
Date: 09/06/2020 01:57 am
EARLY PINTO CLUTCH PEDAL ASSEMBLY
Date: 02/14/2019 06:27 pm
79 pinto headlight,tailight,side marker light assemblies

Date: 07/17/2018 09:22 pm
Wanted - Offenhauser intake for 2.8l (6097DP)
Date: 01/28/2019 05:15 pm

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978  (Read 1352 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 74WagonMeadowGreen

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« on: February 21, 2012, 03:33:14 PM »
When I first brought my 52000 mile original 1978 Pinto home I soon discovered the rear seals leaked, along with a few other rubber-related items failing. I went about replacing everything questionable with so-far good success. However, I replaced my rear seals with 3214 units. Months later, when replacing the master cylinder and booster, I noticed my NEW seals leaking all over. Since the time I had done that job I learned that although the number 3214 (National, Federal Mogul, etc.) seal is indicated to be the proper replacement, IT IS NOT!! According to dimensions, the inner diameter is listed around 1.3 inches... the true axle diameter at the contact point is 1.25 in. I also discovered that the CORRECT seal is number 3199, with a correct, 1.25 Inner diameter. Please do not make my mistake... use the 3199 if you do not like doing a reseal after only weeks!! This info has probably already been submitted, but I figured a reminder would not hurt!
Logged

Offline 74WagonMeadowGreen

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
Re: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 01:34:53 PM »
One addition... Does anyone know what the difference between a 3199 and a 3199S is? Is there any? According to the Timken book, the physical dimensions are identical... is the "S" a different material?
Logged

Offline FB71

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Old Ford homeless shelter

    • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
Re: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2012, 02:32:07 PM »
most likely a different material. Perhaps silicon instead of nitrile rubber.
Logged
Jim

Offline 74WagonMeadowGreen

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Another Pinto Driver

    • Total Badges: 3
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter
Re: REAR AXLE SEAL DILEMMA, 1978
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2012, 02:47:51 PM »
That makes sense... I figured it might also be Timken's way of leading you to think it was something special just to charge more... S = Sucker !!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »