Current Classifieds

Need Brakes for 1971 Pinto
Date: 04/27/2018 11:48 pm
2.3 engine mounts,glove box parts,emblems,hatch,doors,hinges etc
Date: 08/26/2018 06:35 pm
Clutch Cable Needed
Date: 04/03/2017 11:03 pm
1973 Pangra

Date: 01/06/2015 02:19 pm
need 1978 pinto guage cluster
Date: 03/07/2021 07:35 am
Hoard of Pinto parts
Date: 12/17/2016 04:14 pm
WTB Cruising Wagon
Date: 12/07/2016 05:35 pm
EARLY PINTO CLUTCH PEDAL ASSEMBLY
Date: 02/14/2019 06:27 pm
77 Cruising Wagon Front Seats
Date: 04/12/2017 12:37 pm
71,72 Pinto Door Panels

Date: 06/17/2018 08:27 pm
Oil pan front sump style
Date: 01/10/2017 09:19 am
77 Cruising Wagon Front Seats
Date: 04/12/2017 12:37 pm

Author Topic: Installation of an Explorer V6 in a Cruisin Wagon?  (Read 2183 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vintageracer

  • Pinto Driver
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary Topic Starter
Installation of an Explorer V6 in a Cruisin Wagon?
« on: June 22, 2012, 09:20:18 AM »
I am considering the installation of an Explorer 4.0 V6 in a 79 4 Speed Cruisin Wagon.  It appears to me that the cross member will accept the 4.0 V6 and could be a bolt in with the proper motor mounts.  This "swap" would provide a 200 HP motor in stock condition with Fuel Injection and nice packaging for the accessories.

Of course there are other upgrades to consider such as rear-end and brakes however for this thread I would like to ask about the 4.0 upgrade.

This is my first post and I look forward to any replies!

Mike

Offline dick1172762

  • Vintage Pinto Racer
  • PCCA Management Board
  • Pinto Sr. Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2623
  • FeedBack: +362/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Installation of an Explorer V6 in a Cruisin Wagon?
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2012, 03:01:24 PM »
What about the pan????
Its better to be a has-been, than a never was.

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Installation of an Explorer V6 in a Cruisin Wagon?
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2012, 11:42:16 AM »
What kind of oil pan does it have ? If it's a rear sump you have problem. Even if it's as front you might have clearance issues.

Offline Grumpy

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Installation of an Explorer V6 in a Cruisin Wagon?
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2012, 05:38:35 PM »
vintageracer
 
The 4.0 Explorer engine barely weights anything less than a small block Ford, and is even heavier than a small Ford with aluminum heads(450 or so pounds for each+-25 pounds). That is the main reason I gave up on putting a 3.2 SHO motor in mine(480 pounds). Also, the 4.o in the Explorer is known to have "issues" in reliability, fuel mileage and roughness, I would not recomend it. Better would be one of the later Ranger 3.0 v6 engines. They are based on the old 2.8 that was available in the Pinto and most of them are fuel injected. You'll only get about 170 hp stock, but just a cam change and tune would get you to 200. Another good choice would be any of the 2.5/3.0/3.5 v6 family from the Contour/Taurus, Cougar or Mazda 6s. They are all front wheel drive and would need work to convert them but they start at about 200 hp.
 
The perfect engine for a Pinto is a supercharged AJ 8 out of a Jaguar(4.2 400 hp). If you look at a side view of the oil pan area you will see that it looks designed to go over a crossmember in the same place as a Pinto's. The last Thunderbirds and the Lincoln LS have a normally aspirated version(3.9 290 hp), the Land Rover had a 4.4 version in both NA(300hp)and supercharged(450hp), though the oil pan would have to be changed.
 
Another engine would be the 3.4 v8 out of the late 90s SHO. It is an aluminum engine of about 235 hp and has the same bell housing pattern as all the Duratec v6s(thus the same problem of converting to rear wheel drive). You would have to fabricate an oil pan as well.
 
I have chosen to use a Rover V8(4.0 190 hp 250 ft lbs TORQUE)because it weights almost exactly what the 2.3 four weights(315 lbs)and puts out twice the hp and three times the torque in a very similar rev range! Rover was owned by Ford when the engine was made(technically making it a Ford engine)and I have both a 3.9(with a distributor)and a 4.0(wasted fire). You can also find 4.6 versions(or strokers to 5.0). Any of these can be stroked, cammed, tuned and ported to the 300+hp level and still be drivable in a very light car(Pintos are about the lightest at 2400 lbs), though it would have a NASTY idle. Not bad for an engine designed in 1958.
 
Grumpy 8)
79 Pinto Hatch, Yellow w/White Pony stripes, Pony wheels, 6650 miles