Current Classifieds

1973 Ford Pinto Squire Wagon 3 Door

Date: 07/11/2023 11:39 pm
4 speed pinto transmission

Date: 05/13/2021 05:29 pm
Weather Strip, Muffler, Splash Shields

Date: 02/21/2022 11:11 pm
77 pinto cruz. wagon
Date: 06/15/2017 09:18 pm
2.3 turbo intake (lower)

Date: 07/15/2020 09:29 pm
Clutch Cable Needed
Date: 04/03/2017 10:54 pm
71-73 sway bar
Date: 06/12/2021 10:12 am
Wanted - 71-73 Pinto grill
Date: 12/15/2016 03:32 pm
Hood Hinge rubber boots
Date: 09/28/2018 05:49 pm
Wanted Pinto Fiberglass Body Parts
Date: 08/16/2018 08:54 am
Clutch Fork
Date: 03/31/2018 09:12 pm
WANTED: 1979 Bumper End Caps - Front and Rear
Date: 02/16/2019 10:46 am

Author Topic: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns  (Read 1908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 80_2.3_ESS

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 'Till Death Do Us Part

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User
2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« on: June 26, 2014, 10:12:50 AM »
I am getting ready to drop my new 2.5 into my Pinto, and I was thinking about the intake a little today.

I am running a Holley 390 CFM 4-barrel, on an Offenhauser intake. The motor is a 2.5 Liter from a Ranger with Hydrolic lifters and "D" intake ports.

My concern is that the intake has round exit holes (where it meets the head) and the head has "D" shaped intake holes. That means that the air / fuel mixture is going to hit a solid "step" when it tries to flow from the intake to the head.

I was wondering if there was anything I could do about it, short of grinding the intake ports on the head to make them round. Is there a better intake I can use that would still allow my 4 barrel to be used? Any advice?

Thanks!
Nick in CT

1980 2.3L Pinto ESS

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 06:33:20 PM »
Try esslinger they are the 2.3 and 2.5 N.A. guy's if they you do not know about you do not need to do it. On a 2.3 engine that is.

Offline amc49

  • PCCA VIP
  • Pinto Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 1256
  • FeedBack: +242/-1
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2014, 02:47:56 AM »
You pretty much hit the nail on the head with the resolution there. I would say run it like that but the bottom blocked and then part of the middle by way of the divider and more than just the bottom then. If the port was open with no manifold divider it'll run, just top end power will be down a bit.

Offline tbucketjack

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Linux User Mobile User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2014, 02:18:42 PM »
You might be able to build a step up in the manifold with JB Weld and using a gasket as a template and form. Just an idea if you're creative and have the time. Good Luck

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 787
  • FeedBack: +139/-0
  • Soylent Green

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2014, 06:06:55 PM »
The motor is a 2.5 Liter from a Ranger with ...... "D" intake ports.

Wait, it has an actual d-port head, or it has the original 2.5 head?

The '98-01 Ranger 2.5 uses a completely different intake. Nevermind port mismatch; the bolt pattern is different too.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 80_2.3_ESS

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 'Till Death Do Us Part

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2014, 11:26:33 AM »
Wait, it has an actual d-port head, or it has the original 2.5 head?

The '98-01 Ranger 2.5 uses a completely different intake. Nevermind port mismatch; the bolt pattern is different too.

Not 100% sure what the head came off. The ports were D shaped and the Offenhauser intake matched right up. The head has hydraulic lifters too.
Nick in CT

1980 2.3L Pinto ESS