Current Classifieds

1974 Ford Pinto Squire Wagon

Date: 05/30/2020 01:51 pm
2.3 front sump oil pan
Date: 07/24/2018 03:17 pm
Wagon hatch letters
Date: 12/31/2023 04:24 pm
76 station wagon parts needed.
Date: 03/14/2020 01:52 pm
pinto parts for sale
Date: 07/25/2018 04:51 pm
78-80 Windshield
Date: 10/29/2021 03:11 pm
Offenhauser 6114 dp
Date: 09/12/2017 10:26 pm
Parts for 74 Squire Wagon
Date: 09/16/2019 07:35 pm
Brake rotors
Date: 03/24/2017 09:02 pm
1977 Pinto Cruizin Wagon

Date: 08/07/2023 02:52 pm
78 pinto wagon

Date: 06/04/2020 12:42 pm
1980 Ford Pinto Squire Wagon * All original 1 Owner *

Date: 09/15/2019 12:28 pm

Author Topic: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns  (Read 1945 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 80_2.3_ESS

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 'Till Death Do Us Part

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User
2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« on: June 26, 2014, 10:12:50 AM »
I am getting ready to drop my new 2.5 into my Pinto, and I was thinking about the intake a little today.

I am running a Holley 390 CFM 4-barrel, on an Offenhauser intake. The motor is a 2.5 Liter from a Ranger with Hydrolic lifters and "D" intake ports.

My concern is that the intake has round exit holes (where it meets the head) and the head has "D" shaped intake holes. That means that the air / fuel mixture is going to hit a solid "step" when it tries to flow from the intake to the head.

I was wondering if there was anything I could do about it, short of grinding the intake ports on the head to make them round. Is there a better intake I can use that would still allow my 4 barrel to be used? Any advice?

Thanks!
Nick in CT

1980 2.3L Pinto ESS

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 06:33:20 PM »
Try esslinger they are the 2.3 and 2.5 N.A. guy's if they you do not know about you do not need to do it. On a 2.3 engine that is.

Offline amc49

  • PCCA VIP
  • Pinto Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 1256
  • FeedBack: +242/-1
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2014, 02:47:56 AM »
You pretty much hit the nail on the head with the resolution there. I would say run it like that but the bottom blocked and then part of the middle by way of the divider and more than just the bottom then. If the port was open with no manifold divider it'll run, just top end power will be down a bit.

Offline tbucketjack

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Linux User Mobile User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2014, 02:18:42 PM »
You might be able to build a step up in the manifold with JB Weld and using a gasket as a template and form. Just an idea if you're creative and have the time. Good Luck

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 787
  • FeedBack: +139/-0
  • Soylent Green

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2014, 06:06:55 PM »
The motor is a 2.5 Liter from a Ranger with ...... "D" intake ports.

Wait, it has an actual d-port head, or it has the original 2.5 head?

The '98-01 Ranger 2.5 uses a completely different intake. Nevermind port mismatch; the bolt pattern is different too.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 80_2.3_ESS

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 'Till Death Do Us Part

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2014, 11:26:33 AM »
Wait, it has an actual d-port head, or it has the original 2.5 head?

The '98-01 Ranger 2.5 uses a completely different intake. Nevermind port mismatch; the bolt pattern is different too.

Not 100% sure what the head came off. The ports were D shaped and the Offenhauser intake matched right up. The head has hydraulic lifters too.
Nick in CT

1980 2.3L Pinto ESS