Current Classifieds

73 rear hatchback glass
Date: 07/06/2017 11:33 am
77 pinto
Date: 08/22/2017 06:31 pm
1972 Rallye wagon rebuild
Date: 11/14/2020 07:31 pm
WANTED Hood Prop Rod
Date: 01/17/2017 02:47 pm
Seeking reveal molding for driver's door for a 1980 Squire Wagon
Date: 11/08/2020 02:10 pm
80 pinto original

Date: 08/04/2019 10:45 am
76 drivers fender
Date: 07/20/2018 08:24 pm
1973 Pinto 2.3 4 speed transmission. Tube frame roadster frame (roller). 1971 Pinto 2.0 radiator.
Date: 09/05/2018 06:30 pm
Parting out 77 Bobcat Hatch
Date: 11/06/2017 04:16 pm
1971 Pinto Runabout turn key driver

Date: 07/01/2019 12:23 pm
Various Pinto stuff for sale.
Date: 11/21/2018 01:56 pm
Instrument Panel with Tach wanted
Date: 05/15/2022 11:36 am

Author Topic: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns  (Read 2172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 80_2.3_ESS

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 'Till Death Do Us Part

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User
2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« on: June 26, 2014, 10:12:50 AM »
I am getting ready to drop my new 2.5 into my Pinto, and I was thinking about the intake a little today.

I am running a Holley 390 CFM 4-barrel, on an Offenhauser intake. The motor is a 2.5 Liter from a Ranger with Hydrolic lifters and "D" intake ports.

My concern is that the intake has round exit holes (where it meets the head) and the head has "D" shaped intake holes. That means that the air / fuel mixture is going to hit a solid "step" when it tries to flow from the intake to the head.

I was wondering if there was anything I could do about it, short of grinding the intake ports on the head to make them round. Is there a better intake I can use that would still allow my 4 barrel to be used? Any advice?

Thanks!
Nick in CT

1980 2.3L Pinto ESS

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 06:33:20 PM »
Try esslinger they are the 2.3 and 2.5 N.A. guy's if they you do not know about you do not need to do it. On a 2.3 engine that is.

Offline amc49

  • PCCA VIP
  • Pinto Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 1256
  • FeedBack: +242/-1
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2014, 02:47:56 AM »
You pretty much hit the nail on the head with the resolution there. I would say run it like that but the bottom blocked and then part of the middle by way of the divider and more than just the bottom then. If the port was open with no manifold divider it'll run, just top end power will be down a bit.

Offline tbucketjack

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Linux User Mobile User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2014, 02:18:42 PM »
You might be able to build a step up in the manifold with JB Weld and using a gasket as a template and form. Just an idea if you're creative and have the time. Good Luck

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 788
  • FeedBack: +139/-0
  • Soylent Green

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2014, 06:06:55 PM »
The motor is a 2.5 Liter from a Ranger with ...... "D" intake ports.

Wait, it has an actual d-port head, or it has the original 2.5 head?

The '98-01 Ranger 2.5 uses a completely different intake. Nevermind port mismatch; the bolt pattern is different too.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 80_2.3_ESS

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • 'Till Death Do Us Part

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Fifth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User
Re: 2.5 Liter Intake Concerns
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2014, 11:26:33 AM »
Wait, it has an actual d-port head, or it has the original 2.5 head?

The '98-01 Ranger 2.5 uses a completely different intake. Nevermind port mismatch; the bolt pattern is different too.

Not 100% sure what the head came off. The ports were D shaped and the Offenhauser intake matched right up. The head has hydraulic lifters too.
Nick in CT

1980 2.3L Pinto ESS