Current Classifieds

Odds and Ends 1976-77 Pinto Wagon

Date: 07/17/2019 05:23 pm
Pinto Engines and engine parts
Date: 01/24/2017 12:36 pm
'80 Pinto Wagon
Date: 02/01/2018 05:20 pm
Parting out 77 Bobcat Hatch
Date: 11/06/2017 04:16 pm
73 Runabout

Date: 11/20/2017 03:19 pm
Sunroof shade
Date: 06/19/2019 01:33 pm
Early 2.0 engines
Date: 05/09/2018 12:45 pm
Need Mustang II Manual Transmission Mount
Date: 04/21/2017 02:03 pm
Gas Tank Sending Unit
Date: 05/22/2018 02:17 pm
75 wagon need parts
Date: 05/28/2020 05:19 pm
72 pinto drag car

Date: 07/08/2017 08:25 pm
1973 Pinto Runabout

Date: 08/17/2022 06:27 pm

Author Topic: 2.3 conversion to 2.3 turbo  (Read 440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stone

  • Pinto Driver
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter
2.3 conversion to 2.3 turbo
« on: May 09, 2020, 11:01:29 AM »
I am planning to convert my 77 2.3 to a 2.3 turbo. I have many questions but the first is can I use my original engine and add the turbo and misc or do I need to use a 2.3 turbo long block.
I am looking to find a complete 2.3 turbo but I seem to find all the parts more than complete engines.

Offline Wittsend

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2498
  • FeedBack: +241/-0

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Mobile User Topic Starter Poll Voter 1000 Posts Linux User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.3 conversion to 2.3 turbo
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2020, 10:43:47 PM »
The easy answer is, "Yes, BUT..." The main difference between the "regular" 2.3 and the turbo engine is the block has provisions for the turbo oil drainback. People have drilled and tapped the block or created a feed to the oil pan. So, that is a problem but if you are skilled you can work around that. The greater difference is the pistons in the turbo motor are forged and have a lower compression ratio. If you are replacing the pistons that might not be an issue. That said many of us have original turbo engines over 150,000 miles, good crosshatch on the cylinder wall and just keep running them.


There are just so many little things to the swap. I did a write up on my conversion (two parts, the link to part 2 is at the end of part 1). https://www.fordpinto.com/general-pinto-talk/so-you-want-to-build-a-turbo-pinto-part-1/msg76893/#msg76893You might want to read that and then consider your approach.

Offline pinto_one

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • FeedBack: +70/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Pinto-One

  • Total Badges: 10
    Badges: (View All)
    1000 Posts Photographer Tenth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Apple User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.3 conversion to 2.3 turbo
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2020, 07:51:48 AM »
next best thing is to find a 1985 to 88 ranger 2.3 block , it has the drainback there , just pluged , these can be had cheep , great if your still driving the car and can do the swap when the time comes ,  (less chance of small parts getting lost) also the intake manifold can be used for the turbo , you just have to change the injectors out for the larger ones , snagg the EFI wiring out the ranger also , you just have to add a few extra wires forthe mass air sensor , the rest like the distribtor , the head is the same , the next plus is the block has the one peice rear main seal , not like the two piece seal you have now ,
76 Pinto sedan V6 , 79 pinto cruiser wagon V6 soon to be diesel or 4.0

Offline 71pintoracer

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
  • FeedBack: +37/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • '71 Pinto 5.0 T-5 = lotsa fun!

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Mobile User Tenth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary Photographer
Re: 2.3 conversion to 2.3 turbo
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2020, 07:46:32 PM »
Uggg.....what a chore without a doner car! I would say the max boost on a stock 9:1 cast piston Pinto engine would be 5psi. You detonate that dude one time and ka-boom.
If you don't have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?