37 Guests, 0 Users
Last 12 Shouts:

 

pintosopher

Yesterday at 04:03:57 PM
new SEMA SAN Bulletin for CA Drivers, A  $200 Bribe to exempt yourself from Smog Check, if you meet the criteria :o
 

pintosopher

Yesterday at 02:02:41 PM
Udder slapping is practiced in Dairies, but has been heard in pastures everywhere 8)
 

pintosopher

March 29, 2015, 03:41:15 PM
Up With Bar Cat at 1am then up to watch F1 in Malaysia, then off to shoppin, then bed for 2 hours, then Indycar Race at Fla. I'm bushed ???
 

76hotrodpinto

March 28, 2015, 09:06:35 AM
He said udder slapping... Mmm... Yeah... But, what is the sound of one udder slapping???
 

pintosopher

March 27, 2015, 01:53:57 PM
Mmm, nitrite free uncured Chicken Dogs with Tillammok Cheddar, and some Turkey bacon topper. Organic Corn chips to finish it off :P
 

pintosopher

March 27, 2015, 01:43:45 PM
Hmm , indeed! The sound of other Udders slapping the ground might break up the kinetic flow ;)
 

76hotrodpinto

March 27, 2015, 11:57:16 AM
Hmm... I wonder if there is a record for lining up sleeping cows like dominoes, and tipping them... Hmm.
 

pintosopher

March 27, 2015, 11:50:46 AM
Or tips one over ;D
 

76hotrodpinto

March 27, 2015, 11:20:53 AM
It's all fun and games, till someone names a cow!
 

pintosopher

March 26, 2015, 03:35:08 PM
It seems the cow had Udder ideas about revealing her identity. Teat? No ? it's hormone free! ;)

popbumper

March 26, 2015, 03:22:37 PM
....name of the cow.....laughi ng hard on that one. I did NOT but it's in a database somewhere, you betcha!!!!!
 

pintosopher

March 26, 2015, 03:01:10 PM
Fair trade Sauce? Surely you jest, We don't need Fair trade, just Fuel that has no ethanol or oxygenates.  :-X

Show 50 latest

Author Topic: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan  (Read 1668 times)

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« on: April 11, 2013, 02:18:31 PM »
Are they the same?

thanks


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com

Offline Fred Morgan

  • RETIRED- PCCA Trusted Parts Vendor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2338
  • FeedBack: +342/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:25 PM »
NO .
Fred Morgan- Missing from us...
January 20th 1951-January 6th 2014

Beloved PCCA Parts Supplier and Friend to many.
Post your well wishes,
http://www.fordpinto.com/in-memory-of-our-fallen-pinto-heros/fred-morgan-23434/

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 521
  • FeedBack: +29/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2013, 09:40:36 PM »
Are you talking about the 2.0 EAO motor and the 2.3 Pinto motor ? No. Are you talking about the 2.0 and the 2.3 Ranger motor ? Yes....The Ranger had the same motor just debored and destroked from the 2.3. Are you talking about the 2.3 Mazda ? No. The 2.3 HSC front wheel drive engine ? No..Hope this helps...Rememb er for the Pinto 2.3  has a front  sump oil pan and the Rangers etc had a rear oil sump pan. So use only the one for a 2.3 Pinto motor. They are out there.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:05 AM »
Wagon is a 72 2.0 4 speed.  Wanting to install T2.3/ T5 from Turbo Coupe.  Presently in an 87 Mustang/ 24 hours of Lemons car.  It looks like I need at minimum:  Pan, Pickup, mounts.  Mustang driveshaft will work w/ different yoke/ujoint?

Car already has 8" rear.

i also posted about a Zetec conversion, if anyone's heard of one of them being done....

Offline 74turbowagon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 0
    Badges: (View All)
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
I'm currently try to do the same swap but in a 74 wagon

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 521
  • FeedBack: +29/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2013, 10:20:55 PM »
Sir Thomas check the over all length of the Mustang drive shaft.With the one you have. It should work without doing any cutting all you need is to remove the  slip yoke from your Pinto drive shaft and change the U joints from a 1310 to 1330 hybrid and add the T-5 slip yoke. But I'm not 100% sure.  I have heard about cutting the T-5 drive shaft to fit. You also will have to do somethingalbou t your cooling system as the 2.3 engine is longer. The 2.0's have a straight mount for the radiator and the 2.3 have a kick out. Some have moved the radiatorby mounting  it forward etc. As for 74 turbowagon yes you need the complete T-5 ,drive shaft, engine , EEC wiring harness , Exhaust (No your 1 3/4" or 2.0 " will not work) etc. But to really make things work you need to keep the following from your car. The oil pan, oil dip stick, oil pick up, mounts and add T-5 trans mount to the old trans mount from your Pinto...You will also need a set of pedals for a Pinto if your car is an automatic to add the clutch. No a Mustang set from the downer car will not work....There is allot of info here and of course at Turboford.org but not at turbopinto it's not working...


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com