41 Guests, 1 User
dga57
 

pintosopher

Yesterday at 07:55:59 AM
Hammer Tyme, Check the grip for adhesion before pounding the Pedal ;)
 

pintosopher

November 15, 2017, 03:03:46 PM
Hmm, a word spoken in the lonely road of life could be written in stone, but we hope it is read before washed away ;)

dga57

November 15, 2017, 09:04:12 AM
Don't know what the problem is; it's working fine for me. ???

Reeves1

November 15, 2017, 07:09:36 AM
I give up

Reeves1

November 15, 2017, 07:09:15 AM
anyway.... shop

Reeves1

November 14, 2017, 07:02:49 AM
Half what I typed gone ?

Reeves1

November 14, 2017, 07:01:49 AM
Came home after (about) 3 months away working.... to my shop
 

enzo

November 13, 2017, 09:28:41 PM
I suspect most Vets may be as I am, honored to have done so. Thank You.

dga57

November 13, 2017, 01:11:51 PM
enzo, thank you for your service! :)
 

pintosopher

November 12, 2017, 12:33:43 PM
Aeronautics engineers of the past became the Motorhead sages of today and all you have to do is salute their service and look under the hood :D
 

enzo

November 12, 2017, 10:08:54 AM
I was in the Air Force.  Wished I had stayed in.
 

russosborne

November 11, 2017, 11:22:40 PM
6 years US Navy submarine service.

Classifieds

71/72 Pinto front end bushing kit
Date: 02/05/2017 09:45 am
vintage Pinto script sunshades

Date: 03/05/2017 03:27 pm
'78 Pinto Windshield Trim
Date: 05/09/2017 10:46 am
Oil pan front sump style
Date: 01/10/2017 09:19 am
2.0 Mickey Thompson SUPER RARE Rocker cover and belt guard
Date: 08/22/2017 09:21 pm
77 pinto cruz. wagon
Date: 06/15/2017 09:18 pm
71/72 Pinto front end bushing kit
Date: 02/05/2017 09:45 am
1974 Pinto Drivers door glass and parts

Date: 02/18/2017 05:52 pm
SEARCHING HOPELESSLY
Date: 02/02/2017 07:21 am
Brake rotors
Date: 03/24/2017 09:02 pm
Looking for license plate bracket, interior parts 72' Runabout
Date: 04/12/2017 08:15 am
1971 Pinto Drag Car

Date: 07/29/2017 01:17 pm

Author Topic: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan  (Read 3941 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Windows User
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« on: April 11, 2013, 02:18:31 PM »
Are they the same?

thanks

Offline Fred Morgan

  • RETIRED- PCCA Trusted Parts Vendor
  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2338
  • FeedBack: +342/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:25 PM »
NO .
Fred Morgan- Missing from us...
January 20th 1951-January 6th 2014

Beloved PCCA Parts Supplier and Friend to many.
Post your well wishes,
http://www.fordpinto.com/in-memory-of-our-fallen-pinto-heros/fred-morgan-23434/

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 554
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2013, 09:40:36 PM »
Are you talking about the 2.0 EAO motor and the 2.3 Pinto motor ? No. Are you talking about the 2.0 and the 2.3 Ranger motor ? Yes....The Ranger had the same motor just debored and destroked from the 2.3. Are you talking about the 2.3 Mazda ? No. The 2.3 HSC front wheel drive engine ? No..Hope this helps...Rememb er for the Pinto 2.3  has a front  sump oil pan and the Rangers etc had a rear oil sump pan. So use only the one for a 2.3 Pinto motor. They are out there.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Windows User
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:05 AM »
Wagon is a 72 2.0 4 speed.  Wanting to install T2.3/ T5 from Turbo Coupe.  Presently in an 87 Mustang/ 24 hours of Lemons car.  It looks like I need at minimum:  Pan, Pickup, mounts.  Mustang driveshaft will work w/ different yoke/ujoint?

Car already has 8" rear.

i also posted about a Zetec conversion, if anyone's heard of one of them being done....

Offline 74turbowagon

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
I'm currently try to do the same swap but in a 74 wagon

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 554
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2013, 10:20:55 PM »
Sir Thomas check the over all length of the Mustang drive shaft.With the one you have. It should work without doing any cutting all you need is to remove the  slip yoke from your Pinto drive shaft and change the U joints from a 1310 to 1330 hybrid and add the T-5 slip yoke. But I'm not 100% sure.  I have heard about cutting the T-5 drive shaft to fit. You also will have to do somethingalbou t your cooling system as the 2.3 engine is longer. The 2.0's have a straight mount for the radiator and the 2.3 have a kick out. Some have moved the radiatorby mounting  it forward etc. As for 74 turbowagon yes you need the complete T-5 ,drive shaft, engine , EEC wiring harness , Exhaust (No your 1 3/4" or 2.0 " will not work) etc. But to really make things work you need to keep the following from your car. The oil pan, oil dip stick, oil pick up, mounts and add T-5 trans mount to the old trans mount from your Pinto...You will also need a set of pedals for a Pinto if your car is an automatic to add the clutch. No a Mustang set from the downer car will not work....There is allot of info here and of course at Turboford.org but not at turbopinto it's not working...