69 Guests, 4 Users
Reeves1, Pintocrazed, gltrbug, pintoman
Last 12 Shouts:

 

Scott Hamilton

September 14, 2014, 12:50:14 PM
Hey D, having a great weekend- working on some site maintenance stuff.  Thanks for ALL you do!!

dga57

September 14, 2014, 12:28:43 PM
Hi Scott!  Hope you're having a great weekend! :)

fuzzy

September 12, 2014, 06:44:21 PM
ppiinnttoo, try member  map351

ppiinnttoo

September 12, 2014, 03:11:08 PM
Wanted by ppiinnttoo front valance for79 pinto

ppiinnttoo

September 12, 2014, 03:07:35 PM
Need front valance for79 pinto

Budman

September 12, 2014, 09:31:17 AM
Yes he does realize that! It is posted in the classifieds along with pictures
 

russosborne

September 11, 2014, 01:53:53 AM
I don't think he realizes it needs to go in the Pintos for sale section.  ;)
Russ

Reeves1

September 10, 2014, 11:09:04 PM
Budman don't see it listed anyplace or pictures...

Budman

September 10, 2014, 06:19:11 PM
Oh yeah, I'm asking 3000.00 for it. I know it's a bit on the high side but it run and drive like a charm

Budman

September 10, 2014, 06:18:04 PM
I'm trying to sell my 1972 Pinto. I just invested about 3700.00 in a major overhaul. If anyone can help me sell it I would be greatly appreciated. I have some medical bill I need to pay off. Thank you for your time :)

Keghead1970

September 09, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
Hi folks. Need to replace carpet in a 1977 Bobcat. Any places that are not going to sell me junk? Any ideas would be great! Thank you!!

Show 50 latest

Author Topic: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan  (Read 1326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« on: April 11, 2013, 02:18:31 PM »
Are they the same?

thanks


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com

Offline Fred Morgan

  • RETIRED- PCCA Trusted Parts Vendor
  • PCCA Charter Member
  • Pinto Master
  • *
  • Posts: 2345
  • FeedBack: +342/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:25 PM »
NO .
Fred Morgan- Missing from us...
January 20th 1951-January 6th 2014

Beloved PCCA Parts Supplier and Friend to many.
Post your well wishes,
http://www.fordpinto.com/in-memory-of-our-fallen-pinto-heros/fred-morgan-23434/

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
  • FeedBack: +29/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2013, 09:40:36 PM »
Are you talking about the 2.0 EAO motor and the 2.3 Pinto motor ? No. Are you talking about the 2.0 and the 2.3 Ranger motor ? Yes....The Ranger had the same motor just debored and destroked from the 2.3. Are you talking about the 2.3 Mazda ? No. The 2.3 HSC front wheel drive engine ? No..Hope this helps...Rememb er for the Pinto 2.3  has a front  sump oil pan and the Rangers etc had a rear oil sump pan. So use only the one for a 2.3 Pinto motor. They are out there.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:05 AM »
Wagon is a 72 2.0 4 speed.  Wanting to install T2.3/ T5 from Turbo Coupe.  Presently in an 87 Mustang/ 24 hours of Lemons car.  It looks like I need at minimum:  Pan, Pickup, mounts.  Mustang driveshaft will work w/ different yoke/ujoint?

Car already has 8" rear.

i also posted about a Zetec conversion, if anyone's heard of one of them being done....

Offline 74turbowagon

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
I'm currently try to do the same swap but in a 74 wagon

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
  • FeedBack: +29/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2013, 10:20:55 PM »
Sir Thomas check the over all length of the Mustang drive shaft.With the one you have. It should work without doing any cutting all you need is to remove the  slip yoke from your Pinto drive shaft and change the U joints from a 1310 to 1330 hybrid and add the T-5 slip yoke. But I'm not 100% sure.  I have heard about cutting the T-5 drive shaft to fit. You also will have to do somethingalbou t your cooling system as the 2.3 engine is longer. The 2.0's have a straight mount for the radiator and the 2.3 have a kick out. Some have moved the radiatorby mounting  it forward etc. As for 74 turbowagon yes you need the complete T-5 ,drive shaft, engine , EEC wiring harness , Exhaust (No your 1 3/4" or 2.0 " will not work) etc. But to really make things work you need to keep the following from your car. The oil pan, oil dip stick, oil pick up, mounts and add T-5 trans mount to the old trans mount from your Pinto...You will also need a set of pedals for a Pinto if your car is an automatic to add the clutch. No a Mustang set from the downer car will not work....There is allot of info here and of course at Turboford.org but not at turbopinto it's not working...


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com
 


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com