25 Guests, 4 Users
pintofarm, cobra2race, r4pinto, dga57

dick1172762

Today at 07:56:19 AM
The front end alignment spec I listed would be fine on the street. Might be a little hard to steer a very slow turn's. Would be better than a wobble.

Reeves1

Yesterday at 04:23:41 PM
Which reminds me.... what camber/castor would you have on a car that you plan on running as a street/strip car ?

Reeves1

Yesterday at 04:22:41 PM
Checkbook has the speed wobble.....car s are OK LOL

dick1172762

Yesterday at 03:27:35 PM
You need at least 6 deg negative castor for straight line racings with 0 deg camber and ;D 1/16" tow in on a race car.

dick1172762

Yesterday at 11:51:29 AM
Add more caster to front end. ;)

Reeves1

Yesterday at 09:25:58 AM
No......has a nasty speed wobble right now  ;D
 

pintosopher

July 21, 2017, 06:55:05 AM
Life is a Checkbook, Have you balanced yours lately? ;)

Reeves1

July 20, 2017, 10:39:50 PM
LOL !  ;D
 

pintosopher

July 20, 2017, 03:06:20 PM
tide!
 

pintosopher

July 20, 2017, 06:58:58 AM
Life's a Beach , Just remember, There's High

76PintoBoi

July 20, 2017, 01:16:28 AM
Hey guys, Does anyone have the elusive 76' grille? Where I am nobody wants to sell anything, any leads would be awesome! thanks :)

EricReising

July 19, 2017, 05:24:19 PM
Hi all, just wondering how could I get the PCCA business cards to put on local Pintos to see if they would like to join the group??

Classifieds

Drip rail chrome
Date: 01/14/2017 09:18 am
72 pinto and 88 turbo coupe

Date: 06/09/2016 04:13 am
71 pinto runabout 1/2 window hatch

Date: 06/21/2017 11:41 am
1976 (non hatchback) pinto (90% complete project)

Date: 07/10/2016 10:17 am
2.8 Engine mount brackets
Date: 12/28/2016 11:42 am
74 Pinto wagon armrests
Date: 01/18/2017 07:04 pm
1973 Pangra

Date: 01/06/2015 02:19 pm
pinto floor mats??

Date: 01/11/2017 07:27 am
99' 2.5l lima cylinder head

Date: 01/13/2017 01:56 am
parts needed
Date: 02/20/2017 07:58 am
Wanted - 71-73 Pinto grill
Date: 12/15/2016 03:32 pm
Wanted - 71-73 Pinto grill
Date: 12/15/2016 03:32 pm

Author Topic: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan  (Read 3637 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Windows User
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« on: April 11, 2013, 02:18:31 PM »
Are they the same?

thanks

Offline Fred Morgan

  • RETIRED- PCCA Trusted Parts Vendor
  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2338
  • FeedBack: +342/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter 1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:25 PM »
NO .
Fred Morgan- Missing from us...
January 20th 1951-January 6th 2014

Beloved PCCA Parts Supplier and Friend to many.
Post your well wishes,
http://www.fordpinto.com/in-memory-of-our-fallen-pinto-heros/fred-morgan-23434/

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 548
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2013, 09:40:36 PM »
Are you talking about the 2.0 EAO motor and the 2.3 Pinto motor ? No. Are you talking about the 2.0 and the 2.3 Ranger motor ? Yes....The Ranger had the same motor just debored and destroked from the 2.3. Are you talking about the 2.3 Mazda ? No. The 2.3 HSC front wheel drive engine ? No..Hope this helps...Rememb er for the Pinto 2.3  has a front  sump oil pan and the Rangers etc had a rear oil sump pan. So use only the one for a 2.3 Pinto motor. They are out there.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Windows User
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:05 AM »
Wagon is a 72 2.0 4 speed.  Wanting to install T2.3/ T5 from Turbo Coupe.  Presently in an 87 Mustang/ 24 hours of Lemons car.  It looks like I need at minimum:  Pan, Pickup, mounts.  Mustang driveshaft will work w/ different yoke/ujoint?

Car already has 8" rear.

i also posted about a Zetec conversion, if anyone's heard of one of them being done....

Offline 74turbowagon

  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
I'm currently try to do the same swap but in a 74 wagon

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 548
  • FeedBack: +36/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 5
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Tenth year Anniversary Poll Voter Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2013, 10:20:55 PM »
Sir Thomas check the over all length of the Mustang drive shaft.With the one you have. It should work without doing any cutting all you need is to remove the  slip yoke from your Pinto drive shaft and change the U joints from a 1310 to 1330 hybrid and add the T-5 slip yoke. But I'm not 100% sure.  I have heard about cutting the T-5 drive shaft to fit. You also will have to do somethingalbou t your cooling system as the 2.3 engine is longer. The 2.0's have a straight mount for the radiator and the 2.3 have a kick out. Some have moved the radiatorby mounting  it forward etc. As for 74 turbowagon yes you need the complete T-5 ,drive shaft, engine , EEC wiring harness , Exhaust (No your 1 3/4" or 2.0 " will not work) etc. But to really make things work you need to keep the following from your car. The oil pan, oil dip stick, oil pick up, mounts and add T-5 trans mount to the old trans mount from your Pinto...You will also need a set of pedals for a Pinto if your car is an automatic to add the clutch. No a Mustang set from the downer car will not work....There is allot of info here and of course at Turboford.org but not at turbopinto it's not working...