61 Guests, 0 Users
Last 12 Shouts:

dga57

July 04, 2015, 06:32:01 AM
Happy Independence Day!!!  Celebrate safely! :)
 

pintosopher

July 02, 2015, 11:34:43 AM
Egg centric youths has me pondering that move. Thank God for Noah covers ;)

dga57

July 02, 2015, 03:11:44 AM
Personally, I think I'd consider moving! :D
 

pintosopher

July 01, 2015, 02:24:43 PM
Tuesday had us sizzling  at 112 deg. All diners cooked well done, and Sundaes were Slurpy smooth ;)  Humpin to 109 today or.... :o
 

pintosopher

June 30, 2015, 02:25:15 PM
Forget the BBQ, we're cooking with Solar Convection and Hot Iron.  :P 108 or worse by end of Day. Redding going to 115! :o
 

76hotrodpinto

June 27, 2015, 10:52:58 AM
And now... Sizzlin' Saturday! Putting my bacon on the patio to cook... Mmm, BLT's cooked in the sun!.
 

pintosopher

June 26, 2015, 12:02:52 PM
Frying Friday is here and More triple digits are on the burner ???
 

pintosopher

June 21, 2015, 06:55:43 PM
Neckties aside, Who's your Daddy? ;D
 

76hotrodpinto

June 21, 2015, 11:18:43 AM
Happy fathers day! Enjoy your new tie.
 

Starsky and Hutch

June 19, 2015, 09:27:42 AM
do what you do best i dont play corporate corn hole games with bankers anymore....

dga57

June 16, 2015, 01:23:46 PM
Miss you too Becky - maybe we'll get a chance to talk this weekend. :)
 

blupinto

June 16, 2015, 12:00:32 PM
Hi
Dwayne! I miss you!!!

Show 50 latest

Author Topic: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan  (Read 2239 times)

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« on: April 11, 2013, 02:18:31 PM »
Are they the same?

thanks


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com

Offline Fred Morgan

  • RETIRED- PCCA Trusted Parts Vendor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2338
  • FeedBack: +342/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    1000 Posts Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:25 PM »
NO .
Fred Morgan- Missing from us...
January 20th 1951-January 6th 2014

Beloved PCCA Parts Supplier and Friend to many.
Post your well wishes,
http://www.fordpinto.com/in-memory-of-our-fallen-pinto-heros/fred-morgan-23434/

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 523
  • FeedBack: +29/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2013, 09:40:36 PM »
Are you talking about the 2.0 EAO motor and the 2.3 Pinto motor ? No. Are you talking about the 2.0 and the 2.3 Ranger motor ? Yes....The Ranger had the same motor just debored and destroked from the 2.3. Are you talking about the 2.3 Mazda ? No. The 2.3 HSC front wheel drive engine ? No..Hope this helps...Rememb er for the Pinto 2.3  has a front  sump oil pan and the Rangers etc had a rear oil sump pan. So use only the one for a 2.3 Pinto motor. They are out there.

Offline Sir Thomas Crapper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:05 AM »
Wagon is a 72 2.0 4 speed.  Wanting to install T2.3/ T5 from Turbo Coupe.  Presently in an 87 Mustang/ 24 hours of Lemons car.  It looks like I need at minimum:  Pan, Pickup, mounts.  Mustang driveshaft will work w/ different yoke/ujoint?

Car already has 8" rear.

i also posted about a Zetec conversion, if anyone's heard of one of them being done....

Offline 74turbowagon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 0
    Badges: (View All)
2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
I'm currently try to do the same swap but in a 74 wagon

Offline D.R.Ball

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 523
  • FeedBack: +29/-2
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 2
    Badges: (View All)
    Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: 2.0 vs 2.3 oil pan
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2013, 10:20:55 PM »
Sir Thomas check the over all length of the Mustang drive shaft.With the one you have. It should work without doing any cutting all you need is to remove the  slip yoke from your Pinto drive shaft and change the U joints from a 1310 to 1330 hybrid and add the T-5 slip yoke. But I'm not 100% sure.  I have heard about cutting the T-5 drive shaft to fit. You also will have to do somethingalbou t your cooling system as the 2.3 engine is longer. The 2.0's have a straight mount for the radiator and the 2.3 have a kick out. Some have moved the radiatorby mounting  it forward etc. As for 74 turbowagon yes you need the complete T-5 ,drive shaft, engine , EEC wiring harness , Exhaust (No your 1 3/4" or 2.0 " will not work) etc. But to really make things work you need to keep the following from your car. The oil pan, oil dip stick, oil pick up, mounts and add T-5 trans mount to the old trans mount from your Pinto...You will also need a set of pedals for a Pinto if your car is an automatic to add the clutch. No a Mustang set from the downer car will not work....There is allot of info here and of course at Turboford.org but not at turbopinto it's not working...


Advertise Here on FordPinto.com