21 Guests, 1 User
warhead2
 

pintosopher

Today at 06:35:15 PM
Fruitcake season is here, Defend thy digestion and feed the animals in the back yard. Oh wait, this is CA, the animals are fruitcakes....  ;D
 

pintosopher

Yesterday at 07:55:59 AM
Hammer Tyme, Check the grip for adhesion before pounding the Pedal ;)
 

pintosopher

November 15, 2017, 03:03:46 PM
Hmm, a word spoken in the lonely road of life could be written in stone, but we hope it is read before washed away ;)

dga57

November 15, 2017, 09:04:12 AM
Don't know what the problem is; it's working fine for me. ???

Reeves1

November 15, 2017, 07:09:36 AM
I give up

Reeves1

November 15, 2017, 07:09:15 AM
anyway.... shop

Reeves1

November 14, 2017, 07:02:49 AM
Half what I typed gone ?

Reeves1

November 14, 2017, 07:01:49 AM
Came home after (about) 3 months away working.... to my shop
 

enzo

November 13, 2017, 09:28:41 PM
I suspect most Vets may be as I am, honored to have done so. Thank You.

dga57

November 13, 2017, 01:11:51 PM
enzo, thank you for your service! :)
 

pintosopher

November 12, 2017, 12:33:43 PM
Aeronautics engineers of the past became the Motorhead sages of today and all you have to do is salute their service and look under the hood :D
 

enzo

November 12, 2017, 10:08:54 AM
I was in the Air Force.  Wished I had stayed in.

Classifieds

1973 Ford Pinto Station Wagon

Date: 10/26/2017 10:49 pm
Front sway bar frame brackets
Date: 07/13/2017 01:05 am
1974 Pinto Inside Rear View Mirror & Brake Pedal Pad

Date: 02/18/2017 04:41 pm
SEARCHING HOPELESSLY
Date: 02/02/2017 07:21 am
1974 Pinto Right Rear Interior Trim Panel

Date: 02/18/2017 04:44 pm
1973 pinto parts

Date: 07/25/2017 11:45 pm
72 pinto drag car

Date: 06/22/2017 07:19 am
1973 Ford Pinto Station Wagon

Date: 10/26/2017 10:28 pm
2.0 Mickey Thompson SUPER RARE Rocker cover and belt guard
Date: 08/22/2017 09:21 pm
1973 pinto parts

Date: 07/25/2017 11:46 pm
Dumping '80 yellow Pinto

Date: 06/21/2017 03:45 pm
Need lower control arms for 1973 pinto
Date: 02/27/2017 10:10 pm

Author Topic: My 1972 turbo swap thread  (Read 41181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pinto_one

  • PCCA Charter Member
  • Pinto Master
  • *
  • Posts: 848
  • FeedBack: +62/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Pinto-One

  • Total Badges: 9
    Badges: (View All)
    Photographer Tenth year Anniversary Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Apple User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #240 on: August 30, 2017, 07:06:36 AM »
If you have Disk brakes up front you may not need an up grade , just need power brakes  , I have it on my pintos and works very well and wish i had them sooner , can lock them up very easy at highways speeds , so no problem , you just might have to install a brake booster ,I believe it can be done , the early pinto is very light , mine is close to being 800 lbs heaver , Auto , A/C , power everything along with a V-6 , My wheels are 15 X 7 4 lug , run a 205/60/15 , everything clears up front , as for the 8" rear end I have a rear housing with axles if you want them , got to pick then up here or anyone that headed your way can , (Free)  and Dutch Wagon I have a set of stock pinto mag wheels if you can get your friend to carry them over to you , stock 13'  had to got to the 15,s because the 13inch tires like 195/70/13 are not sold here any longer , over your way they are ,
76 Pinto sedan V6 , 79 pinto cruiser wagon V6 soon to be diesel or 4.0

Offline robertwwithee

  • Pinto Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
  • FeedBack: +4/-0
  • Another Pinto Driver

  • Total Badges: 1
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #241 on: September 02, 2017, 02:17:40 PM »
Dutchwagon picked some wheels over there in NL.  I will probably head over next year for more training with company.  Love the Pinto group and company that sends me world wide.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk


Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #242 on: September 02, 2017, 08:31:33 PM »
Yes, the 2.3T engine is about 110lbs/50kg heavier than the 2.0 it replaced and several other parts have added weight or will. The stock 9" brakes feel really inadequate after a spirited drive yesterday.


Update: All I seem to do is spend money and get nothing done. Can't take it with you, right? ;)

New shoes:


New coolers:


Why won't 11" brakes fit behind stock 13s? Bolt pattern aside, here's why:


It's amazing that these cars stop at all.


That's an old Granada rotor I've been dragging around for 10+ years, originally a spare for the Granada swap I've been planning to do on my '68 Mustang for....10+ years.

On a side note, the Mustang has been diverting some of my attention and funds away from the Pinto. A large wood rat moved in while the car was mothballed and not only tore up the engine bay, but destroyed the shift boot and started on the interior. The rat died of acute lead poisoning yesterday and now I'm working toward getting the engine rewired.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline Wittsend

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1687
  • FeedBack: +190/-0

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Mobile User Topic Starter Poll Voter 1000 Posts Linux User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #243 on: September 02, 2017, 08:54:38 PM »
I had rats getting in my '61 Corvair station wagon (the heater ducting is a "Habitrail" to them). For 20+ years now it has been a storage container and thus (like it sounds with the Mustang) doesn't get driven.  I put it up on jackstands and put drywall mud bucket lids between the top of the stand and the car. The lids seem to make a sufficiently slippery surface the rats can't grab onto and since doing so 5+ years ago have not had a problem.

  Well, no problem with live rats. The smell is still present despite having cut out flooring, securing the opening with plywood and power washing the whole interior numerous time with bleach, laundry detergent and then numerous coatings of Urine Gone.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #244 on: September 07, 2017, 07:43:54 PM »
If you have Disk brakes up front you may not need an up grade , just need power brakes  , I have it on my pintos and works very well and wish i had them sooner , can lock them up very easy at highways speeds , so no problem , you just might have to install a brake booster ,I believe it can be done , the early pinto is very light , mine is close to being 800 lbs heaver , Auto , A/C , power everything along with a V-6 , My wheels are 15 X 7 4 lug , run a 205/60/15 , everything clears up front , as for the 8" rear end I have a rear housing with axles if you want them , got to pick then up here or anyone that headed your way can , (Free)  and Dutch Wagon I have a set of stock pinto mag wheels if you can get your friend to carry them over to you , stock 13'  had to got to the 15,s because the 13inch tires like 195/70/13 are not sold here any longer , over your way they are ,

Woops, I didn't see your reply.  :P Thanks for the offer on the 8", but I don't know how I'd get it here.

I can lock the little stock manual brakes, but slowing down from high(way) speed quickly is not as confidence-inspiring.

95% of my brake swap parts came in today anyway. Metric calipers, pads, hoses, bearings, etc.  8)
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #245 on: September 09, 2017, 11:34:20 PM »
Preview of coming attractions:


I'll leave this to your imagination.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #246 on: September 11, 2017, 07:35:59 PM »
Sunday was spent modifying caliper brackets and doing the fit up. This side would have been done and installed completely, but was thwarted by needing some brake line adapters I didn't have.







Yes this weld is ugly, but I'm confident that the strength is satisfactory. I was having trouble getting it all clean enough to use the TIG and resorted to flux core. (That gold chromate is awful) It's welded  more on the other side and that part is under compression during braking.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #247 on: September 23, 2017, 07:59:18 PM »


Progress was slow due to me being out of town last weekend and no lathe access today, but one side effectively done:


'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #248 on: October 07, 2017, 10:58:27 PM »
I'm going to roll last week's progress into this weekend's update(s).

The axles required spacers to set the MII bearing offset.


and they had to be shortened, which is pretty tough with hardened chromoly


old vs new


MII drums redrilled for fives


I got the rear in the car today and the brakes are bled and everything, but I still have to make some hub-centric rings before the wheels go on. Then....test drive.  8) It's going to be a big change going from 3.55s to 3.00s, but I ran the numbers and it ought to be within about 50rpm at 60mph of the '86 'Bird my driveline came from.

Oh, fun fact: the relined Wagner brake shoes I got for this project happened to be old shelf stock and are made of asbestos. The light gray fuzzy fibers gave it away.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline Wittsend

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1687
  • FeedBack: +190/-0

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Mobile User Topic Starter Poll Voter 1000 Posts Linux User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #249 on: October 08, 2017, 05:52:34 PM »
Here is my experience with the 3.00 rear:

1. The T-5, 3.97/4.01 first gear is a near granny gear.  So, I did not find the 3.00 (coming from a 3.40) to be a negative.

2. Initially I was using the 3.00 with 215-60-14" tires. This gave a longer pull time in each gear (more time under boost) that I didn't necessarily see as a negative.

3. The negative I had with the 3.00 gears was that in normal street driving the power band never seemed to fall into a decent point for typical speed limits.  A given gear seemed to wind out too much and an upshift seemed to bog.  I found it very frustrating.

4. I went to 3.40 and for general driving it is very pleasing with the current 175-70-13" tires though I still think first gear is a bit granny.  Eventually I'm going to a taller tire to alleviate that and also get back to the longer pull time under boost.

5. I realize tire size (height) is also a determining factor but in general I think with the turbo motor and the T-5, 3.25 are about the best rear gears. Unfortunately I was told that Ford only offered that ratio briefly and it is almost never found outside of aftermarket. The 6-3/4" did have 3.18 but the strength issue is there.

What is the tire size? I'm looking forward to your impressions of the 3.00. And, as always your work is top notch! As too the asbestos, don't worry, We are too old for that to kill use before something else does.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #250 on: October 08, 2017, 07:14:11 PM »
Thanks. The tires I got are 205/50R15 so they're only about 23" tall.

Annnndd....



The back needs to be lowered a bit, but at least it's all back together.

The 3.00 gears are actually pretty good with my car and the 'Bird T5. It seems to accelerate about as fast as before, but can stay in boost longer now.  I did find a 3.25 open center section for sale a few days ago, but now I'm just going to wait until I get a limited slip diff of some kind.

Maybe now I can focus on getting it intercooled.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #251 on: October 15, 2017, 11:42:57 PM »
And it needs an intercooler. After bleeding the passenger front brake a little more and finally getting a good pedal, I took it out to cover some shakedown miles. In the upper gears I can hear it pinging. The intake temp hovers around 150F all the time and only goes up from there when under boost. 16psi is probably a lot for no IC.... :o

It's been a while since the last video, so behold audible pinging:


Spent some of yesterday lightening the BOV piston. Original was all brass and quite weighty. I blew the center out and replaced it with an aluminum core. Mass was reduced by more than half, so it should be able to open better than twice as fast. This was done in preparation for a Holset turbo down the line. Rumor has it that the tiny 6mm quill holding the compressor on can fail under high boost surge and that a fast-acting BOV helps prevent it. True or not, it was something I planned to do anyway. I was hoping that the pointed tip would be quieter than the original, but I think it might actually be louder.  ???






And I experimented with anodizing titanium. Because reasons.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline 73wagon

  • Pinto Driver
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • FeedBack: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male

  • Total Badges: 4
    Badges: (View All)
    Poll Voter Mobile User Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #252 on: October 22, 2017, 06:05:31 PM »
One of the best looking Pintos ever! Simple,clean looking car.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #253 on: October 31, 2017, 07:27:39 PM »
Thanks a lot!  :D

There have been a lot of non-Pinto things taking up my time as of late, so here's a Cliffs version:

- Put five gallons of 100 octane in the car. Car loves it...may be habit-forming.  :o
- No pinging means staying in the throttle enough to discover the engine noses-over at 4500rpm. Suspect worn         valvetrain.
- Seat belt buckle broke last week. Fixed it.
- Vacuumed the interior afterward. Discovered a leaking heater core.
- Got a new core. Not installed yet.
- Got an intercooler plumbing kit. Not installed yet.
- Got some better braided front brake hoses and fittings. Not installed yet.
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline dick1172762

  • Vintage Pinto Racer
  • PCCA Management Board
  • Pinto Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2372
  • FeedBack: +357/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #254 on: November 01, 2017, 09:30:07 AM »
Your car should be an example to the world of Pintos that a bunch of cobbled up mod is never necessary to have very nice looking Pinto without spending mega $$$$. Yours is a very NICE car that anyone would be proud of. Keep up the good work!!!!
Its better to be a has-been, than a never was.

Offline Wittsend

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1687
  • FeedBack: +190/-0

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Mobile User Topic Starter Poll Voter 1000 Posts Linux User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #255 on: November 01, 2017, 01:08:56 PM »
... - No pinging means staying in the throttle enough to discover the engine noses-over at 4500rpm.  ...

That was my experience as well. My set up was from my Turbo Coupe that for 10 years was my daily driver. Obviously a much heavier car. So, I was a bit surprised when the Pinto didn't seem any faster/quicker, only that it made a lot more noise. That, and there was now this presence I needed to shift (4,500 RPM nose over) if I were to perceive an accelerative force. The best way to describe it that is was like a 10 speed bike on level ground and one might have felt it accelerated better starting in 2nd, or 3rd gear as 1st gear was just too low.  The "fun" of my car was with the 3.00 rear gears and 215-60-14" tires, getting up to 40 MPH in 3rd gear and then pressing (not slamming) into the throttle. That made for a lengthy "pull" and thus the most satisfying. It's just that as I stated above with the 3.40 gears it is much better for in town driving and having the right gear at the right time.

I'm wondering if the Pinto/RR cam is any of the difference maker from the T/C/factory flat cam in the way I perceive acceleration???

Offline dick1172762

  • Vintage Pinto Racer
  • PCCA Management Board
  • Pinto Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2372
  • FeedBack: +357/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #256 on: November 01, 2017, 02:23:57 PM »
I've talked to several members on here with the Ranger cam, and all say the cam quits pulling above 4500 rpm. It's made for torque in a pick up truck and as such will never see 5, 6, or 7000rpm. Perfect example of saylavee (such is life).
Its better to be a has-been, than a never was.

Offline 65ShelbyClone

  • Pinto Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 595
  • FeedBack: +24/-0

  • Total Badges: 6
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Mobile User Linux User Windows User
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #257 on: November 05, 2017, 10:01:33 PM »
Your car should be an example to the world of Pintos that a bunch of cobbled up mod is never necessary to have very nice looking Pinto without spending mega $$$$. Yours is a very NICE car that anyone would be proud of. Keep up the good work!!!!

That's quite a compliment. Thanks!

I happened to notice a sticky note on my desk that I wrote some time back in 2014. It has the stock '86 'Bird engine specs and the power peak is at 4600rpm. That is the stock rating; the cam in mine is visibly worn enough be down on lift by 0.030-0.050" which probably makes it wheezier.

I have a Ranger roller to install to at least bring it back to stock. I think I'll make an adjustable cam pulley to retard timing and bring the power peak in a little later though. It's tempting to just pull the head and take a little iron out behind the valves...
'72 Runabout - 2.3T, T5, MegaSquirt-II, 8", 5-lugs, big brakes.
'68 Mustang - Built roller 302, Toploader, 9", etc.

Offline dick1172762

  • Vintage Pinto Racer
  • PCCA Management Board
  • Pinto Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2372
  • FeedBack: +357/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #258 on: November 06, 2017, 01:42:19 PM »
One can never say too much on such a good car. Inter it in as many car shows that you can stand. Spread the Pinto love story.
Its better to be a has-been, than a never was.

Offline Wittsend

  • Pinto Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1687
  • FeedBack: +190/-0

  • Total Badges: 8
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Mobile User Topic Starter Poll Voter 1000 Posts Linux User Windows User Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #259 on: November 06, 2017, 04:43:05 PM »
That's quite a compliment. Thanks!

I happened to notice a sticky note on my desk that I wrote some time back in 2014. It has the stock '86 'Bird engine specs and the power peak is at 4600rpm. That is the stock rating; the cam in mine is visibly worn enough be down on lift by 0.030-0.050" which probably makes it wheezier.

I have a Ranger roller to install to at least bring it back to stock. I think I'll make an adjustable cam pulley to retard timing and bring the power peak in a little later though. It's tempting to just pull the head and take a little iron out behind the valves...

I'll look forward to your impressions of the RR cam.  This is pure speculation on my part but with a turbo I'd think that duration would be more important than lift. The rational being that under pressure you can likely push more air past the valve at the same lift over a N/A engine. But if the valve is only open so long ... might that become the greater limiter???

Offline dick1172762

  • Vintage Pinto Racer
  • PCCA Management Board
  • Pinto Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2372
  • FeedBack: +357/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Signature Poll Voter Windows User 1000 Posts Tenth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary
Re: My 1972 turbo swap thread
« Reply #260 on: November 07, 2017, 01:04:05 PM »
I have talked to several members on here that are using a Ranger roller cam. They all say you need to grab another gear by 4500 RPM. I talked to one member in the north east who runs a turbo and a Ranger RR cam. 4500 RPM max is what he says. Only thing I can is the lifters. I ran anti pump up lifters in my 80 Pinto race car. With a stock cam it would go past 6000 RPM with ease. This might be problem with the Ranger RR cam. I have Comp Cams anti pump up lifters along with the RR cam in my 80 Pinto soon to be a daily driver. I let you know when I get to drive it again.
Its better to be a has-been, than a never was.